Democrats Try Reversing Recent Supreme Court

http://news.yahoo.com/apnewsbreak-22-states-join-campaign-finance-fight-063148340.html  Notable here is the subtle and secret influence of the Democrat party in using a coverup, namely the Montana election contributions law as the cause for their joining forces against the US Supreme Court Case, Citizens United.  The Democrat President Obama openly embarrassed himself, insulted the nation and angered several justices of the Supreme Court when he used the State of the Union Address to attack the Justices of the Supreme Court over Citizens United.  Now Democrat ruled New York State seeks to use this relatively innocuous law in order to reverse the Citizens United ruling.  Fortunately, the Justices do not live in ivory towers and their independence from coercive influences from any White House Administration is boldly protected by our Constitution and precedence law.  Yes, I agree that the US Supreme Court has not always ruled as I would like.  However, the rulings have overwhelmingly protected the citizens of the nation against  over-reaching and tyranny seeking White House administrations.  It is important to note that these are judicial decisions of Constitutional law and the enforcement of those decisions is left to the President, his attorney general and the States Attorneys General.  In the infamous and ignominious decision of the Andrew Jackson administration, the ruling in favor of the civil rights of the Cherokee native americans was not enforced.  Rather the reverse happened and US army forces were used to arrest, uproot, and remove by force thousands of indians from their ancestral lands to the deserts of the west.  This Trail of Tears is evidence of the cruel injustice that can be visited on people when White House administrations  radically opposed Supreme Court decisions.