http://michellemalkin.com/2011/09/21/lightsquared-obamas-dangerous-broadband-boondoggle/
The only thing one can say is Amazing. Investigative reporters like Michelle Malkin are very careful with their research and with the legality of their reporting. This article reads like the Mafia is control of the White House and that what we actually have is a Chicago on the Potomac
Who is it in your life that most influenced what you do?
http://www.newsmax.com/InsideCover/bill-clinton-hillary-ablest/2011/09/20/id/411721?s=al&promo_code=D175-1 Can Hilary still be the first female US President. Indeed, she can. Hilary is the recipient of adulation and anger. Her stint as wife of President Bill Clinton, did not automatically make her qualified to be USA President. However, her stint as Secretary of State in the dysfunctional Obama Administration, may make her very competitive as a candidate for President. This writers opinion. I am not automatically an adherent of Hilary Clinton. However, the Secretary has proven mettle as Sec. of States, and like her husband she dearly loves America, which for this writer is a bottom line criteria for President, since, I wholeheartedly believe that President Obama just does not understand what love of Country is- since he is a Globalist Socialist. However, Mrs. Clinton will need to trim her own Globalist and Interventionist tendency. This writer, as noted in other posts, wholeheartedly believes that the USA should not intervene in the internal affairs of Sovereign States.
http://www.newsmax.com/InsideCover/bill-clinton-gingrich-2012/2011/09/20/id/411722?s=al&promo_code=D175-1 This is a very interesting article because Bill Clinton is a thinker. It also reveals the respect that President Clinton has for Speaker Gingrich. I always pay attention to President Bill Clinton because he is a moderate Liberal with real life experience, was President for two terms, and was willing to actually compromise, and actually collaborate with the Republican party because unlike President Obama, Bill Clinton loves America, is not an idealog, and can see beyond his predilictions to the realities of the moment.
Including the latest deaths, at least 28 international troops have been killed so far this month in Afghanistan.
Time to go. This writer does not believe that Western involvement in the civil wars of foreign countries is ever in the best interest of the USA. Although a US Army Chaplain in 2004 I was opposed to the war in Iraq because I am opposed to war period! However, in 1977, many of my friends refused military service. With the All Volunteer force, that was a luxury provided to them. However, as a Citizen and yes, as a Christian, I felt a call to service because our service member deserve their right to the ministrations of their religion, as provided in the Constitution, and the US Code and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. Therefore, I volunteered to serve the soldiers, and of course the nation. Twenty five years later, when the US government went to war against Iraq, I was opposed to war, as always. However, how can one, for twenty-five years “say” they will serve and when called upon to enter active duty in support of soldiers, say “NO”. Principles are Principles. Commitment is Commitment. Duty is Duty. If not? Then why bother having such concepts? None the less, I am committed to the principle that is war is bad. The writer believes it is not our duty to militarily interfere in the civil internal affairs of sovereign States, like Libya, Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, etc. So, let us get out of Iraq, completely. No US ground forces there. Let us get out of Afghanistan, completely. No US ground forces there. If we want to negotiate a military outpost in each of those countries, as a stage for rapid response of US forces when enemies directly attack us, okay. Such an action is good global politics in an era of piracy and international terrorism. However, strict guideline apply as to the use of US military assets when interfering, UN mandate or not, in the internal affairs of Sovereign States.
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/rep-john-fleming-field-criticism-over-600k-income-153305241.html
Fleming was merely pointing out a consequence of tax increases–that business owners will have less money to re-invest and hire new workers if they decline to take a pay cut. But his message likely won’t resonate, as Jansing said, with “average Americans.” This is the key reality that is buried deep in the center of the article. The reporting here is more of the sensational pro Obama reporting that telling one message in the headline, reinforces that message in the first several paragraphs and then makes a factual correction toward the end of the article , a point by the way, that most research on news reading, points out that the reader has gone onto other articles since the average American reader gets, the headline and the first two paragraphs and forgets the rest of the article.
http://news.yahoo.com/fact-check-rich-taxed-less-secretaries-070642868.html
In order for US Citizens to take care of themselves, they need accurate reporting by the US Press Corp. However, it is evident that much of the News media are favorable toward President Obama and therefore they report the news with a prejudice in favor of the President’s position. Until Now. During the last month this writer observes that the News Media in USA have matured enough to be fair to the American public. This article, which exposes the faulty claims made by President Obama concerning his new tax the Rich scheme..that the facts do not support his claim. It seems that Rep. Paul Ryan’s claim that the Obama Jobs bill and recent Tax claims are nothing more than “…trying to set up a class warfare in USA in order to get himself re elected.
The key point and it was really a big one was made about Romney. He has been and is a successful businessman. Now many people want to bash the businessman. Obama wants to make them all equal to the worker and “level the playing field” plus Obama is setting up a class warfare based on money earned which is destructive of business in America. Romney has business experience, he has a good respect for and strong support among the business community. He is pro business. That means he is in favor of creating American jobs. The government’s hiring is like the Transportation Security Administration. They are “thousands standing around”…what in the world did these people do before they were hired by the taxpayer to search travelers?… actually they do not search they merely watch you…Anyway, TSA employees, citizens all, and assuredly good and fine citizens, but they do not produce anything. They provide a service, which is to watch me as I pass thru the metal detector…but they have no product…nothing is created…and what we need is business jobs that consume resources like metal and rubber and food and turn it into something else like a boat or a plane or a hot dog…Romney understands government because he was the governor of a populous Eastern State, and he understands business, and this combination of executive experience plus government service and his detailed jobs creation plan, makes him the nominee in my book
While President Obama is playing politics with our future, the price of food at the supermarket is climbing. While Obama is playing games with our tax future by pretending to tax only the rich, he is actually increasing the amount of money out of everybody’s pocket. While Obama is taxing us 400 billion for his help the Unions job plan, the same Unions plan on spending billions of dues collected from these tax payer funded union jobs. On What will they spend the collected dues? They will spend the tax funded dues to campaign for the election of Obama to a second term. Then he can propose to tax us again to kept the union workers working while the rest of us lose our jobs, take a pay cut in the form of higher taxes. Or if he actually does get elected, and the Republicans lose control of the House of Representatives, we will see the USA enter the final death crisis of a bankrupt economy that has printed too much money, owes foreign nations too much interest and a country that has regulated and taxed its citizens into perpetual poverty.
LikeUnlike · · 9 minutes ago
Progressive Politics 