The Russian are now lapdogs to Obama and Sarkozy.

http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1693121,00.html

How did it happen that Sakozy became such an arch enemy of Gaddafi.  This writer remembers the days when the Western Nations looked forward to welcoming Col Gaddafi and Libya into the world of modern progressive peaceful nations.  Then all of a sudden we are told that Gaddai is a tyrant, a dictator and an international criminal.  What did Gaddafi do?  There are plenty of accepted stereotypes and a lot of allegations but we do not call in the North Altantic Treaty Organization to decimate a nation’ military, destroy it infastructure and attempt to over throw its’ government based on stereotypical anti arab prejudice and heresay allegations.  This blogger has repeated opposed and constantly written against the United Nations sanctioned war of aggression against Libya and its’ legal government.  I have called out NATO as a military alliance which is pursuing an illegal war of criminal aggression against Libya.  Every day is a very sad day for our world because the United Nations is morally compromised by its craven cowardice is not revising its resolution 1973 by removing its complicit agreement to this aggression.  This is a resource war for oil by member states against Libya.  The Libyan oil resource war is evidence that the United Nations is no longer a credible agency for peace and justice in our world and that the United Nations should itself by cited by the International War crimes tribunal at the Hague for its legalization of blatant criminal aggression by its members.  Sadly, the only hope for justice in the United Nations Security Council is the Russian delegate who can introduce censure and sanction resolutions against NATO and in favor of the grieviously injured people of Tripoli and all other bombed and straffed Libyan cities.  But the Russians, although initially seeming to side with justice against resolution 1973, have now been sidelined by Sarkozy, Obama and Cameron.  I never thought to see the day when great Russia would be reduced to a vassal for the two greatest imperialist colonialist nations of the West, France and Britain!  In fact, Sarkozy is so emboldened that he recently called for a similiar resolution of power to NATO as regards Syria and Sarkozy taunts the Russians to dare to oppose him in the Security Council.  Who would have ever thought to see Putin as a lap dog for Menvedev and Menvedev as a lacky for Sarkozy? Indeed, the internal situation within the sovereign nation of Syria is serious but should an interventionist colonial power like France be allowed to assert a new dominance over an Arab State like Syria.  Should the Russians agree to stand idly as the NATO military alliance makes  the Russian influence in the region of no significance?  It is a strange twist of fate that this writer, who is an ardent pro America citizen of the USA, should be looking to a former Communist totalitarian dictatorship for the protection of the sovereignty of nations.  But such is my hope as we face the new world order totalitarianism of Obama, Sarkozy and Cameron.

Clinton on Libya

http://news.sky.com/skynews/Article/201103115948598?om_rid=NsgG76&om_mid=_BNd32VB8Zi2Jkg

The key questions that must be pressed on Obama Administration officials is , “Why is the so-called popular uprising of the people of Libya not succeeding?”

According to the article cited, the key to USA diplomatic policy in Libya is that we are supporting the vast majority of the people who are in a massive revolt against the Libyan government and that this effort MUST NOT be an outside invasion or an imposition of Western military power in Libya.  Yet, the Obama people say okay to missile strikes against the government and its building, cities, telecommunications, ports, roads, airports and citizens.  The Obama people say okay to the use of A10 killer machine low flying aircraft against Libyan uniformed military personnel.  (The A10 can kill  5000 persons in one minute.) Yes, in a minute.  President Obama signs a “secret” protocol, which has the effect of an empowering order, to allow USA military and clandestine forces to supply weapons and training to the rebel army inside Libya.  They also send Special Forces operatives into Libya as attack spotters who call in the coordinates for airs strikes and missile attacks.  USA government operatives under the CIA are actively engaged in fomenting anti Libyan government propaganda.  Yet, all of this is failing to topple the government.  Do you not think that a very weak, unpopular and merely dictatorial gang of a few Libyan leaders would have been routed by now?  Is it possible that the legal and internationally recognized government of Libya is actually supported by the people?  Is Hilary telling us one thing but pursuing an opposite policy?  It is just not true that the government of the USA is attempting to help the Libyan people.  Rather, the USA government is acting as a criminal aggressor in an undeclared war of conquest against the legal government of oil rich Libya.  Our government is doing this to seize control over the national treasure of Libya which is vast oil deposits.  Our government is using an obsequious and compliant United Nations in a betrayal of the very essence of the United Nations Charter. No one may care about Libya, after all it is an arid desert country of dark-skinned arab muslim people.  However, this writer sees in this care-less-ness the same ignorance on the part of the USA citizens that allowed us and the rest of the world to ignore the Nazi genocide against the Gypsies, Homosexuals, Roman Catholics and Jews.  We are involved in Libya in such a way as to justify the charge of “State Sponsored Terrorism” to be lodged against the USA in the same international courts that have accused Serbs, Croats and Sudanese of Crimes against Humanity.

Is Gates Gone Because Like McChrystal he Disagreed With Obama?

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/26/world/26gates.html?_r=2&hp

Gates seemed to part of the Obama Administration for the long-term. At first he was merely the silent carry over from the Bush administration.  His continuation was a surprise because he was the CIA man during “waterboarding” and he was Secretary of Defense after Donald Rumsfeld.  That made him a participant in what the Obama administration has blamed for the wrong war, (Iraq) and the wrong methods “waterboarding’.  However, this writer was glad because Mr. Obama had denounced both and claimed that he would call all American troops home by 2009 and that he would prosecute CIA personnel as criminals and he would enter more fully into the “right” war which he defined as Afghanistan.  However right Mr. Obama’s ideas may have seemed to the millions who elected him, they were worrisome to the Military, the Intelligence Community and to the other millions who did not vote for Barrack Hussein Obama.   So when Gates decided to stay on as the Secretary of Defense and the Obama people allowed him, many felt relieved that sense and sanity would prevail over political ideology.

However, with the recent support of the Obama Administration for what they call the Arab Spring, the USA witnessed the reality and complexity of a duplicitous White House.  Some review first:

Please remember that Obama went to Egypt and the whole Mid East as one of the very first things he did as President.  During that 2009 trip the President called upon the Arab world to embrace a whole new concept of Freedom, and democracy.  It was a call to revolution. It was a speech addressed to the Arab World and just recently a later installment of that call was made by Obama in his speech for a Israeli return to 1967 borders.

This blogger has no inside information concerning any USA aid to revolutionary groups within the mid eastern counties and I have no insider information concerning CIA and other clandestine support for rebel groups inside those counties.

However, response to a new US President and the ideas of the “Audacity of Hope” concepts put forth by the Obama government seem  to be linked with organized and well equipped rebellions within the target nations.  The central planned and unified command structures of the uprisings in Tunisia and Egypt and Syria and Libya are all too obvious- namely, the same issues for the street campaigns, the same signage, the same titles for each of the escalating days of “reckoning” “justice” “”rage” etc themes which indicated central planning and unified organization and funding instead of spontaneous and locally inspired discontent.  These factors indicate revolutionaries from outside the targeted countries who were provocateurs inciting street rebellions.

Then we get Tunisia which government easily collapses.  Then Egypt which also easily falls.  But Libya and Syria seem to linger.  The weaker of the two and the one with the most oil is Libya so we see the charade of humanitarian assistance at the end of 218 cruise missiles and two thousand five hundred bombing raids.  We see the farce of UN sanctioned mandates for civilian protection which is quickly used as a coverup for violent illegal aggression against the armed forces of the legal Libyan government in support of the rag-tag rebellion army.

Suddenly Secretary Gates appears before Congress with a sour faced Admiral Mullen next to him as Gates declares his opposition to the “war” in Libya.  And just as suddenly we hear of Gates being replaced by an old politically trusted hack named Leon Paneta and the CIA job  going to General Patraeus whose strategy in Afghanistan is failing.  Could it be that Paneta’s new job is to bring the military into line politically with the Obama idea of the “New World Order” and to bring the CIA into that same orbit.  (Interesting that Obama is also bringing McChrystal back as some kind of picture boy to be paraded around indicating additional military support for the Obama agenda?! Sad to see such a really great General reduced to a political puppet. But then again, when Obama shuts a person out, like he did McChrystal, the punishment is severely enforced until the person being punished begs for mercy.)

Is the Arab Spring Actually an Obama Idea for World Revolution?

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/17/world/africa/17diplomacy.html?_r=2&hp

Not too much here to say that was not covered in other posts.  However, one absolutely must ask the question of the connection betweeen the NATO led and Obama backed Aggression to topple the Libyan government and Obama’s speech that Irael must return to 1967 borders.  Was the “1967 Borders” speech an overt threat to Israel?  Was Obama warning them to stay out of his “Middle East Spring” plan? Did he force the Isreal leader to speak supportively here in order for Obama to continue to give them the money?  I believe that the Master Mind of the New World Order is Barrack Hussein Obama, President of the United States, Commander in Chief of all USA military forces, leader of the NATO alliance, and Executive Director of the Democrat Party.  Add to these New World Order achievements the increased legality for INTERPOL to arrest US citizens within the USA, the recent arrest of the Serbian General on a warrant issued by a International Court, and the pursuit of other so called “enemies” by the United Nations.  Is the New World Order being put into practice right in front of us based on an agenda that such an international police power is only to be used against crimnals and other bad guys?  However, who elected these leaders and Judges, and Police departments?  And who trained and deputized and empowered the international police force?  Does anyone really believe that such international power, once given, can be stopped?

Baseball, Sparky and Christianity

http://www.thepostgame.com/features/201105/other-side-sparky

Many bloggers have picked up this story as evidence that this man saw the fallacy of Christianity and abandoned the Church.  Such a very tiny bit of social behavior on the part of the Priest could not cause this life long Roman Catholic to abandon the Church,  and refuse a Church Funeral.  The article depicts a sincere and good man, and I am sure he considered that he too may have made some minor social mistakes during his life.  This kind of practicing Christian was not unaware of any faults of his own that others had silently forgiven.  Surely, he saw the Priest as a man with a job.  The Priest obviously has come to his friend.  Good.  The Priest has done his role with the dying Catholic.  Good.  So what that the Priest was an avid Baseball fan!  The Coach merely decided to affirm  something that he practiced throughout his life, humility.  The self-righteous anger of many bloggers about this devout Roman Catholic dishonors his memory.  He decision about his own funeral was a final action of a devout Christian man who was consistent.  He understood that his “daily Mass” attendance had inculcated in himself an attitude of gratitude in his own life which for Jesus’ sake resulted in good works and charity throughout his life.  One small fault of one priest who was a baseball fan did not cause Sparky to abandon all of that.  Instead, it informed his decisions concerning what he most wanted, and that was to be the best Christian he could be and if that meant no funeral or memorial service because he rested completely in the arms of Jesus and not his own fame, that speaks volumes.

Did Gaddafi Agree to Leave and USA Refuse to Allow Him?

http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2011-03-09/aborted-gaddafi-amnesty-dealdetails-from-an-insider/?om_rid=NsgG76&om_mid=_BNd32VB8Zi2Jkg

What is the true intention of the massively illegal Libyan War conducted by the Western military alliance called NATO?  This writer believes that NATO involvement in Libya is a “Resource War” for control of Libyan oil. The phony coverup of so called protection of innocent civilians does not fit with the delivery of such humanitarian aid by bombs on Gaddafi’s home town, by 218 Cruise missiles against uniformed Libyan troops defending their nation against armed rebellion, and now by the use of increased anti personnel weapons capable of slaughtering Libyan uniformed troops in the field of battle.  The article purports that the Leader of the Revolution in Libya was potentially leaving but the Western nations prevented it!  The question is, “Does the Libya Resource War represent a resurgent European militarist imperialism?  Is the USA the secret ally of this Western “first world” aggression upon the “third world” Libya?  Are the American people now part of a covert international terrorism which seeks the clandestine overthrow of governments we do not like?

CIA Definitely Involved In Libya.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/31/world/africa/31intel.html?_r=1&src=mv

Somehow the USA and other Western nations think that it is okay for them to secretly involved inside of country with the intention of killing its leader and overthrowing it government by force.  As we review the actions of the Obama Administration relative to Libya we see that it engages in duplicity, which is essentially lying.  Maybe that does not surprise us in the USA who have read the Baldacci novels and the Bourne movies.  However, it underscores the fact that when other nations accuse the USA of itself being a terrorist nation, then we cannot legitimately disagree.  This writer, however, believes that although we understand the need for spying, the actions of the USA relative to phony rebels and the continued escalation of a “Resource War for Oil” in Libya reveals a cynical federal administration in Washington.  It is an administration that believe in the ideas first said you the Nazi Josef Goebbels, namely, that if you tell the people a lie often enough they will believe it.  Do citizens of the USA really want to be followers of a Nazi propangandist? As you read the article please be honest to recognize facts revealed, namely, that the USA is spending an enormous amount of money for planes, missiles, etc. in order to overthrown the legal government of Libya, which makes us, liars, cheats, and terrorists.  (It hurts me to say this about my nation, I served in the army for thirty years and four of those years in full support of our wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.  But those were declared wars using our troops out in the open.)

Repub. Make Right Decision on Budget Limit.

It was a hard call but the newly elected House Republicans made the right call and so did many good willed Democrats as they rejected the concept of raising the debt limit without requiring massive cuts in spending.  The newly elected House Republicans were sent to Congress by the Electorate and the message from the American people to the Obama Administration and to the entire Federal government was Stop the spending increases and cut the budgets of current and projected programs.  Congratulations.  You are true American Patriots.  No more compromises on the part of the House of Representatives with a Democrat administration that does not deal fairly, does not keep it pledges, does not take the House seriously.  The Constitution gives the House of Representatives the power of the purse and this writer believes that the majority of Americans are supportive.  It has been a tough week for the people as we wondered if the newly elected Republicans would collapse under Democrat and Presidential pressure? They did not and by voting as they did they have begun to establish again a Constitutional Republic as our founders and all generations until now have intended.  And as for Senator Harry Reid, Please stop being such a phony and lying on the floor of the Senate about how bad those terrible Republicans Reps are and how they will not compromise and how they will not cooperate.  Harry, remember your own words concerning the House proposed Ryan Plan.  You said it was “dead on arrival”.  I do not call THAT a spirit of compromise and cooperation.  Until the Senate Democrat party  starts working FOR America and not stupidly against Republicans, or until we replace the Dogmatic Democrats like Lautenberg and Menendez of New Jersey with genuinely patriotic Senators, nothing will get done to improve the everyday life of the citizens.

Were Sarkozy and Gaddafi political Allies Once?

http://www.euronews.net/2011/03/16/gaddafi-s-son-calls-the-libyan-rebels-traitors/

The pundits tell all of us to ignore this information because it “obviously” another smear and lie campaign by that terrible monster COL. Gaddafi.  But just consider if there is any truth in the son’s claims.  Well, if I were a novelist I would have Sarkozy double cross Gaddafi and use political intrigue to help me wipe Gaddafi and his family off the map.