Category: Uncategorized

NATO Claim Indicates Error.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110413/ap_on_go_ot/uc_us_libya

The French and The British tried to fool the USA into thinking that Libya was in a state of civil war against Gaddafi.  They further tried to topple the Libyan government by using the ruse of humanitarian support for beleaguered civilians.  The early days of UN sanctioned support have given way to lesser USA support and a worldwide rejection of the British and French lies.  The Libyan people were not in general uprising against their government.  The rebel army was a motley crew of ragtag insurrectionists, disgruntled former army officers, and Al Qaida operatives. The Libya government was not crumbling under the leadership of a maniacal dictator and the army of Libya remained loyal to the government.  Therefore, the Brits and the French want to increase ground attacks against Libyan Army personnel and equipment in order thereby to topple the government, cripple Libyan domestic organization, create general hardship and disruption of security and to install a unknown, untried, and disorganized array of anti Gaddafi leaders, all of whom had previously fled the nation and were living comfortably in France and Britain while the good people of Libya tried to cooperate with the government and through processes of consistent and loyal opposition to the regime gain concessions and internal improvements to the lives of the ordinary Libyan citizen.  These efforts were recognized by both the Bush (43) and Obama administrations who sent high level diplomats to Tripoli and by a process of identifying past wrongs, (Lockerbie) the payment and the acceptance of the payments as restitution for Lockerbie, and pledges of greater cooperation with the West and promises of increased democratic freedoms in Libya, achieved significant progress toward promises of  measured democratic freedom in Libya. Now, by a process of criminal aggression, the Western European Nations, backed by a naive and inexperienced President, have destroyed not only all improvement, but because of their own diabolical attempt at a new capitalist colonial imperialism in Libya, have ignited fears throughout the region that they will attack other nations and destroy them as well.  President Obama is right to stay in a support role and should be bolder.  He should withdraw support for attacks against Libyan government forces because it is obvious that the general population is not in rebellion against the government.  Secondly, President Obama should respond through formal diplomatic channels to the Libyan government with reassurances that formal and not back channel diplomatic engagement for a resolution of the criminal aggression is desired.  Thirdly, the President should remove the “Gaddafi must go” statement with assurances that the USA is not a party to regime change imposed by aggressive former colonial and imperialist nations. And the USA will withdraw all special forces personnel, trainers of the rebels, secret CIA agents, and clandestine USA fighters from Libya.  Fourthly, embassy should be made to the Tripoli government with promises that build on the three above, to include money payments by US oil interests for the rebuilding of the destroyed security and infrastructure of Libya in return for free and fair access to Libyan oil deposits.  In return, the Libyan government will agree to a gradual, guaranteed, long term process of democratization of Libya in cooperation with USA diplomatic missions and overseen by joint commissions of Libyan government and American diplomatic personnel.

Is Obama’s War Legal?

The Judge, filling in for Glenn Beck tonight, highlighted the idea that the Obama war in Libya is illegal.  The basics of his argument were that the Constitution gives the President the right to go to Congress for a Declaration of War when the supposed enemy  has attacked the USA, is about to or threatens to attack the USA, or can be shown to be a direct threat to the national security and sovereignty of the USA.  In the case of Libya, none of these factors are true, yet, the USA has launched 212 missiles against the sovereign state of Libya, dropped numerous bombs, attacked its navy and killed its army personnel. All of this is a usurpation of power by the President and in the Judge’s words, the spineless response of a broken Congress.

Obama Birth Certificate?

Tonight Bill O’Reilly wanted to dismiss the problem of President Obama’s birth certificate as not being important.  But it is important for the ordinary people of the nation.  Last month I needed to get a renewed driver’s license. I was required to provide six proofs of legality.  There was absolutely no way I could have said to the motor vehicle clerk that I had my private records sealed by a Judge and therefore they would not be able to see the six required proofs.  Indeed, I COULD have said that but then I would not be given a license.  Yesterday, a friend told me that he was called for jury duty.  The judged asked if he was a citizen.  He said, “yes.”  Now, consider that the judge asked if he were a citizen and therefore, if the judge did not believe him, I am sure the judge had the power to request proof of that citizenship, which for a natural-born citizen is his birth certificate.   A few years ago I was stopped by a State trooper.  He required of me a license, a vehicle registration and a proof of insurance.  I could not say that those documents were sealed by a judge.  He would not only have given me several tickets but would have told me to get out of the car and had the car towed to the impoundment area.  It is amazing that the President of the USA has his personal records under lock and key and sealed to outside eyes by a judge.  What is the President hiding?  It is a mockery of our USA legal system to use it to hide from the eyes of the citizens.  How can anyone follow the lead of a President who hides his school documents, his student loan applications, his school registrations and applications, and his birth certificate from the eyes of the people he rules ( sorry, I should have said, the people he serves, but sometimes Obama is more a ruler than a public servant)

Daily BeasT Article on Libyan Cease Fire.

http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2011-04-11/give-the-libya-cease-fire-plan-a-chance/?om_rid=NsgG76&om_mid=_BNpEYpB8aQGbEp

Now that the USA has stopped the criminal bombing, maybe it will take the moral leadership role that President Obama claimed.  Sadly, this writer believes that the USA will continue to back the French and British Neo Colonialists who are attempting a new imperial empire in North Africa.

True World Aggressors Revealed

http://www.news.yahoo.com/s/nm/us_libya…
This article gives further proof that Britain and France are the true aggressors now that the USA has stopped its criminal bombing of Libya. Let the French and Brits get out from under the cover of NATO, then declare war on Libya as that is the legal way to invade another nation. And let them suffer the disapproval of the world for their criminal warmongering.

NATO Aggression Against Libya A Crime.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20110409/wl_nm/us_libya_nato;_ylt=AvPatV15zKToDiYLRO7GwpSoOrgF;_ylu=X3oDMTJydnVrYjk0BGFzc2V0A25tLzIwMTEwNDA5L3VzX2xpYnlhX25hdG8EY2NvZGUDZ21wZQRjcG9zAzUEcG9zAzUEc2VjA3luX3RvcF9zdG9yaWVzBHNsawNuYXRvc2F5c2Rlc3Q-

The NATO forces are brutal aggressors against the Government of Libya.  The blatant attacks against the tanks and army of the central government of Libya are criminal aggression as defined by the international Geneva Convention. The Geneva Conventions were agreed to after WWII and clearly state that the armed forces of one nation which attack the armed forces of another nation without a Declaration of War are Criminal Aggressors.  The Nuremberg Trials that convicted the Nazi and the Fascists after WWII clearly state that Criminal aggression is a War Crime.  No NATO nation was attacked by Libyan government forces.  No embassy of a NATO country was attacked.  So the attacks on Libyan government tanks, personnel carriers, and ground forces are an unprovoked attack of a terrorist nature.  Additionally the Law of War which is the legal manual used by USA forces concerning the legality of offensive actions, states that it is legally wrong to violate the legal borders of a sovereign State without provocation.  The Arab nations and the world have good reason to decry and denounce the French, English and Belgium forces that are carrying out these attacks.  Remember that all three countries have a dark history of colonial imperialism and especially France and Belgium have a history of rapine murder and slaughter of civilians in Africa.  By their own statements and policy the NATO forces are siding with a rebellion against the Libyan central government.  This makes the NATO forces provocateurs, partisans, and terrorists.  Write your congress person to demand a stop to this war of criminal aggression in Libya.  No one can claim that humanitarian aid is being delivered by bombs, Gatling guns, missiles and the like.  These things are only deliver death and destruction.

Vatican and Christian Leaders Promote Peace

http://www.romereports.com/palio/Program-released-for-Assisi-Prayer-Gathering-2012-english-3842.html

Click the above for a great video.  You will not see this on your nightly news.  It is good that the Christian religious leaders of the world have initiated and continued to work for world peace.  Hey, you might get upset with some of the disturbed priests who have done bad things.  But taken as a whole, the church carries out world wide charity, world wide medical care and world wide efforts for peace.  Yes, some priests are more than stupid in their actions but then there is John Paul ii, Benedict xvi and Mother Theresa of Calcutta, Father Damien of the Lepers and Maxim Kolbe of Daucau.