NATO Claim Indicates Error.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110413/ap_on_go_ot/uc_us_libya

The French and The British tried to fool the USA into thinking that Libya was in a state of civil war against Gaddafi. They further tried to topple the Libyan government by using the ruse of humanitarian support for beleaguered civilians. The early days of UN sanctioned support have given way to lesser USA support and a worldwide rejection of the British and French lies. The Libyan people were not in general uprising against their government. The rebel army was a motley crew of ragtag insurrectionists, disgruntled former army officers, and Al Qaida operatives. The Libya government was not crumbling under the leadership of a maniacal dictator and the army of Libya remained loyal to the government. Therefore, the Brits and the French want to increase ground attacks against Libyan Army personnel and equipment in order thereby to topple the government, cripple Libyan domestic organization, create general hardship and disruption of security and to install a unknown, untried, and disorganized array of anti Gaddafi leaders, all of whom had previously fled the nation and were living comfortably in France and Britain while the good people of Libya tried to cooperate with the government and through processes of consistent and loyal opposition to the regime gain concessions and internal improvements to the lives of the ordinary Libyan citizen. These efforts were recognized by both the Bush (43) and Obama administrations who sent high level diplomats to Tripoli and by a process of identifying past wrongs, (Lockerbie) the payment and the acceptance of the payments as restitution for Lockerbie, and pledges of greater cooperation with the West and promises of increased democratic freedoms in Libya, achieved significant progress toward promises of measured democratic freedom in Libya. Now, by a process of criminal aggression, the Western European Nations, backed by a naive and inexperienced President, have destroyed not only all improvement, but because of their own diabolical attempt at a new capitalist colonial imperialism in Libya, have ignited fears throughout the region that they will attack other nations and destroy them as well. President Obama is right to stay in a support role and should be bolder. He should withdraw support for attacks against Libyan government forces because it is obvious that the general population is not in rebellion against the government. Secondly, President Obama should respond through formal diplomatic channels to the Libyan government with reassurances that formal and not back channel diplomatic engagement for a resolution of the criminal aggression is desired. Thirdly, the President should remove the “Gaddafi must go” statement with assurances that the USA is not a party to regime change imposed by aggressive former colonial and imperialist nations. And the USA will withdraw all special forces personnel, trainers of the rebels, secret CIA agents, and clandestine USA fighters from Libya. Fourthly, embassy should be made to the Tripoli government with promises that build on the three above, to include money payments by US oil interests for the rebuilding of the destroyed security and infrastructure of Libya in return for free and fair access to Libyan oil deposits. In return, the Libyan government will agree to a gradual, guaranteed, long term process of democratization of Libya in cooperation with USA diplomatic missions and overseen by joint commissions of Libyan government and American diplomatic personnel.

Is Obama’s War Legal?

The Judge, filling in for Glenn Beck tonight, highlighted the idea that the Obama war in Libya is illegal. The basics of his argument were that the Constitution gives the President the right to go to Congress for a Declaration of War when the supposed enemy has attacked the USA, is about to or threatens to attack the USA, or can be shown to be a direct threat to the national security and sovereignty of the USA. In the case of Libya, none of these factors are true, yet, the USA has launched 212 missiles against the sovereign state of Libya, dropped numerous bombs, attacked its navy and killed its army personnel. All of this is a usurpation of power by the President and in the Judge’s words, the spineless response of a broken Congress.

Daily BeasT Article on Libyan Cease Fire.

http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2011-04-11/give-the-libya-cease-fire-plan-a-chance/?om_rid=NsgG76&om_mid=_BNpEYpB8aQGbEp

Now that the USA has stopped the criminal bombing, maybe it will take the moral leadership role that President Obama claimed. Sadly, this writer believes that the USA will continue to back the French and British Neo Colonialists who are attempting a new imperial empire in North Africa.

NATO Aggression Against Libya A Crime.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20110409/wl_nm/us_libya_nato;_ylt=AvPatV15zKToDiYLRO7GwpSoOrgF;_ylu=X3oDMTJydnVrYjk0BGFzc2V0A25tLzIwMTEwNDA5L3VzX2xpYnlhX25hdG8EY2NvZGUDZ21wZQRjcG9zAzUEcG9zAzUEc2VjA3luX3RvcF9zdG9yaWVzBHNsawNuYXRvc2F5c2Rlc3Q-

The NATO forces are brutal aggressors against the Government of Libya. The blatant attacks against the tanks and army of the central government of Libya are criminal aggression as defined by the international Geneva Convention. The Geneva Conventions were agreed to after WWII and clearly state that the armed forces of one nation which attack the armed forces of another nation without a Declaration of War are Criminal Aggressors. The Nuremberg Trials that convicted the Nazi and the Fascists after WWII clearly state that Criminal aggression is a War Crime. No NATO nation was attacked by Libyan government forces. No embassy of a NATO country was attacked. So the attacks on Libyan government tanks, personnel carriers, and ground forces are an unprovoked attack of a terrorist nature. Additionally the Law of War which is the legal manual used by USA forces concerning the legality of offensive actions, states that it is legally wrong to violate the legal borders of a sovereign State without provocation. The Arab nations and the world have good reason to decry and denounce the French, English and Belgium forces that are carrying out these attacks. Remember that all three countries have a dark history of colonial imperialism and especially France and Belgium have a history of rapine murder and slaughter of civilians in Africa. By their own statements and policy the NATO forces are siding with a rebellion against the Libyan central government. This makes the NATO forces provocateurs, partisans, and terrorists. Write your congress person to demand a stop to this war of criminal aggression in Libya. No one can claim that humanitarian aid is being delivered by bombs, Gatling guns, missiles and the like. These things are only deliver death and destruction.

Can Obama Grow Up?

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_us_libya

President Obama needs to grow up into the national and international leader that the USA needs. So far the President has played the blame Bush game. A game which is childish at the core and essentially a cry baby approach to government. Connected with this has been the victim game. The President is always crying that it ain’t his fault. It’s those nasty other guys. All too often the Obama scolds America about a wide range of things, essentially saying that America is not worthy of him. If he isn’t scolding us he is apologizing for us to the world. He started this apologizing even before he was elected and has continued it as he bowed to the feudal Saudi king and the Japanese Emperor. Now instead of wagging his finger at us, he is lecturing us about being adult as we face the trillions of dollars of debt he has foisted upon us. Of course, it could not be his fault, he inherited all of the problems! Well fine, if you want to accept his excuse, but all he is doing is making matters worse. Like war in Libya. It is very disturbing to see the USA join with imperialist England (look at their so-called British empire!) and colonialist France, their colonial period was even uglier, and also with Belgium, whose King Leopold was the butcher of the Congo, killing hundreds of thousands of Africans and enslaving the rest. Together with these NATO allies we attack and decimate a north Africa Arab Muslim nation of only 5.5 million. Our rockets, bombs, and Gattling gunned A-10 anti-personnel planes (capable of killing about 1000 people a minute) are viciously arrayed against the army of the government of Libya. I guess that since they soldiers are pro Gaddafi it’s okay to slaughter them. Oh, and by the way, for a nation to wage war against another nation without a declaration of war is considered by the Law of War to be criminal aggression. That applies as well to Iraq and Afghanistan. But you say, the UN okayed it with that cowardly phrase that the USA could use all means necessary (who defines necessary?) to protect civilians. Yes, but siding with the rebels against the government and assisting them in their war against the government makes us Partisans. Did you know that the Law of War allows Partisans to be summarily executed if captured? Gaddafi sent the President a letter which it seems is treated as a joke by Obama. However, we have dealt with Gaddafi as a legal head of State as late as two months ago. The letter was delivered through diplomatic channels and was accepted by the USA government at the hands of an embassy from Gaddafi. These actions translate into continued recognition of the Gaddafi Government as the legal representatives of Libya. The mature, adult, and internationally recognized response to accepting such a missive is for the head of State who read the letter to respond in exactly the same manner, namely a diplomatic letter responding to Gaddafi and delivered through diplomatic channels by an embassy to Libya. Hey, those are the rules for responsible adult citizenship in the world of international diplomacy, (I don’t make the rules) and it is infantile for the Obama Government to embarrass the nation by acting cavalier in this matter. If you give no respect then you get no respect. And it does us no good to dismiss an Arab leader, no matter how we dislike him. Such a dismissal can rightly be understood as an arrogant disrespect for Arab Muslim leaders in general. So grow up President Obama, get with internationally recognized norms and become the adult leader that the people of the USA need for times such as these.

Why Is Obama a Hater of Gaddafi?

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/af_libya

There must be a reason why last year it was okay for the leader of Libya to come to the USA, stay here un harmed and not arrested and to address the United Nations. But this year he is a Pariah and Obama and his people are doing everything to destroy him? Obama launched the aggression without consulting Congress but instead he sought permission from NATO and the New World Order government in Brussels to use USA military. Now he sends envoys to the rebels and their French supported rebel council but he does not send high level ambassadors to Gaddafi. Now last year he did deal with Gaddafi as the legal head of State and this year he doesn’t. It’s time for Barrack Obama to get real as a world leader and stop pandering to the likes of French colonialists and British imperialists. The rebels are their proxies. It is obvious that the rebels are not able to recruit the civilians into their rebellion. They also are not of a size to defeat the government forces. Be bold Obama. Send a high level envoy to Gaddafi and stop the carnage. And PLEASE no more talk of our negotiating with him but at the same time announcing that the result of the negotiations must be his ouster or demise. That is really silly. If you were Gaddafi would you agree to such terms?

Ivory Coast Mass Murders but only Words from USA.

http://www.catholicnews.com/data/stories/cns/1101333.htm

The USA Administration of Barrack Obama still engages in the brutal attacking of the Libyan government armed forces but give only words to Ivory Coast Mass murders. This writer does not suggest the USA intervene with boots on the ground in Ivory Coast and not in Libya. It is my position that the foreign policy of the USA is bigotry against Libya and tolerant toward other dictators who are much worse. Admittedly, Gaddafi said things like “I will have no mercy” but we do need to remember two things, one was that he faced an armed rebellion whose goal was to kill him and his supporters and the Libyan army. Secondly, like Saddam Hussein before him who claimed to be ready to launch the “Mother of all battles” the Arabs are known to exaggerate reality. The Daily Beast has an excellent expose’ of the nefarious reasons why the French President wanted to invade Libya. It should be must reading as to why we do not want to continue killing Gaddafi people anymore.

Why are the Russians Silent?

In the days before the UN resolution authorizing the no fly zone in Libya, the Russian Foreign minister stated that if the USA pursued the no fly zone concept as regards Libya, the Russians would veto it in the Security Council. Instead, the Russians merely abstained. However, soon after the NATO aggression against Libya began, Putin stated that the attacks against Libya were barbaric and reminiscent of the Crusades. However, the President of Russia disagreed and Putin shut up. It is noteworthy that Secretary Gates visited Russia before the UN resolution. It is frightening to think that the world may need to depend upon Russia and a veto in the UN Security Council for protection of the rights of sovereign States. After all, it was the Russians who after WW II were the criminal aggressors against Poland, Czech, etc. All during those terrible Cold War years the USA constantly invoked the concept of the Sovereign Nation State in order to counter the criminal occupation of the Eastern Block nations. However, now the USA under Obama’s New World Order ideas, is the aggressor and maybe occupier of another sovereign nation! Russia has murmured on the side lines since Putin was forced to shut up. However, the future of the free world may depend upon a former communist dictatorship and not in the USA. It seems like the Pres. and the Admin. are willing to bomb and destroy the armed forces of another country all the while declaring that the bombs and cruise missiles and other brutal military weapons are the agents of peace and harmony protecting the so called civilians from bad bad Gaddafi.

Let’s Help Obama Get Out Of Libya

Get out of Libya. That is what Secretary of Defense Gates meant when he addressed the Congressional committee. Let’s face it, Obama made a mistake and he should be big enough and bold enough to realize it, confess it but above all, he needs to get out of Libya. We can all help in this. Our President is very inexperienced and naive about most things and especially about international affairs. In the case of Libya he made a very big mistake and when the election comes he will be judged, but in the meantime, he is the President and has committed our forces to pursue the wrong policy and engage in the wrong war. Libya is minimally a rebellion of dissent former army officers and maximally a civil war. In both cases, the USA has nothing to do with it. This is even more true when we consider our lack of involvement in the Ivory Coast where there are thousands of genocidal deaths. In Libya almost none and definitely none genocidal. So, what to do? We need to cut the President some slack, and for now let him off the hook he so foolishly got all Americans onto when he arrogantly pronounced that Gaddafi must go. The President must totally disengage from Libya immediately. This course of action is in our national self interest. Additionally, we can encourage Obama to take diplomatic initiatives to impress upon Gaddafi our help if he takes immediate actions to democratize his government. President Obama’s ideological doggedness should not involve our nation in pursuit of the wrong cause for the wrong reasons no matter how nice a guy we think our smiling President to be. Rather, in the use of lethal force, we need to encourage our President to stop immediately his ill advised foray into an adventure which is really a third war.