Went to see 2016 the movie. Mr. D Souza, the President of King’s college does a thorough job of analysis concerning Barrack Obama’s intellectual world view. It is a world view that sees the USA as a thief which steals the wealth and resources of third world nations. Mr. Obama feels that it is his job to level the playing field. How? by diminishing the wealth and financial strength of USA in favor of advancing the wealth and financial power of other countries. He has done this during his presidency by denying offshore drilling permits to USA companies and using US dollars to fund Brazilian and other concerns to drill in Brazil as direct competitors with USA firms. He has done this by denying the pipeline permit thereby weakening USA competitiveness in the oil markets. The bottom line is that President Obama does not see his job as being the advance of America but that of forcing the decline of USA world power. See the movie yourself for a thorough understanding of D’Souza’s analysis. However, be warned that it is a chilling piece of analysis that will stun you, surprise you, entertain you and ultimately cause you to wonder if Dinesh D’Souza has answered for all of us the question, “Who really is Barrack Hussein Obama and what will he do with four more years of unbridled Presidential power?” What I mention here is only a very small part of Mr. D’Souza’s examination of what makes Obama tick. For myself, I have felt from the beginning that Mr. Obama does not love America.
Tag: Putin
Obama Administration Lies Again.
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/obama-administration-denies-role-arming-syrian-rebels-232112058.html How can we ever believe the Obama Administration?! Please note that in the USA we consider the government to belong to the people. The present managers of the government are called the administration. I think this is true of Western European Democracy in general. For instance, the Queen of England is the Head of State and the Prime Minister is the manager of the government. However, the Obama administrators seem to think of themselves as being the government and the citizens as being the enemy. That is why the lie to us constantly, try to work around and not with the Congress and are persistent in undermining the foundations of our system of governing. Happily, more and more of the main stream media like the Washington Post, and the New York times are taking their journalism seriously and have stopped pandering and covering up for the first black president in US history. Now they are reporting the facts as they have always known them to be and the facts tell us a story of a government that consistently lies to its people. Jay Carney, the spokesperson for the Obama back room cronies, is constantly disingenuous and plays with words trying to tell us that gray is red and orange is really not a primary color, So what, Mr. Carney, aiding the rebels with …communications equipment that we know they will need when they have achieved the objectives we want and expect… is just a polite way of saying that we back the rebels against the government of Syria and that we are covertly Partisans in a covert operation to topple the Assad government. Are we really so self-righteous that we think we can aid and assist rebels to kill legal police, army and government officials of a sovereign nation and use bombs to cripple the Syrian national infrastructure, while claiming in public that we back UN peace plan? The legal government of Syria has every right to defend itself against outside provocateurs and instigators of internal violence in the same way that we defend against those we claim are terrorists. Would not the USA government attack those who tried by force to overthrow the Obama administration? Why does the United Nations condemn member governments that try to maintain stability within their internal boundaries? Why doesn’t the International Criminal Court in the Hague indict the USA for criminal aggression and crimes against humanity when it is our assistance that fosters, promotes and sustains criminally violent behavior? Strangely and surprisingly it is V. Putin and the government of Russia that stands as defender of the integrity and sovereignty of Syria while it is Obama and the USA that is attacking that nation with the intention of installing a puppet USA friendly government in Damascus. And as for War Hawk and Monger Mc Cain. I should think that he would abhor war since he is a victim of it. Instead, he seems to promote war and destruction at every opportunity. Shame on him.
Graham and Mc Cain War Oriented
It continues to disturb this writer that Senator Mc Cain is a very hostile person who wants war, armaments and interventionist policies to prevail. We intervened in Egypt with our President Obama saying that our long time friend Mubarak “Must go”. The result is chaos in Egypt and a military government trying to prevail against radical terrorist Muslims, and Islamic radical mobs burning Christian Churches, terrorising Christian business people and threatening to make Christianity illegal in Egypt. Then we supported the rag-tag rebellion against the sovereign government of Libya, which government was a UN member, forsworn against terrorism and nuclear armament in return for USA consideration. But our government changed from George W. Bush and Condie Rice to Barrack Hussein Obama and Hilary Rodman Clinton, both of whom reneged on USA promises, backed the UN resolution 1973 against Gaddafi, and supported the 2300 bombing raids, the 225 cruise missile attacks, and the use of the terrifying A 10 anti personnel aircraft against the legal, uniformed and legitimate military forces of the sovereign UN recognized Libyan government. The result is chaos, a weak central government and the fear that the approximately 10 to 20 thousand shoulder launched missiles of the Gaddafi government are now being funneled to A Qaeda. Hey, folks, the so-called terrorist Gaddafi and his military forces did not use those anti-aircraft, anti tank, anti naval missiles! Why not? Because they believed assurances that the UN resolution 1973 protected them against the murderous rebels. Instead, Gaddafi was brutalized and obscenely murdered, his son killed, and his supporters rounded up and quietly exterminated by the new “freedom loving??” Libyan government. The Syrian Government is also an independent sovereign State, member of United Nations and engaged in a brutal civil war. And yes, the legally constituted government and the legitimate uniformed military forces and police of that government have been brutal in suppression of the civil war. However, in the USA, it is illegal for anybody to advocate the violent overthrow of the USA Federal or State government. In fact, if such an armed conflict broke out in the USA, the penalty is death by firing squad or hanging. Such death by bullet or rope, could under a military emergency and martial law, be administered by the USA military forces in summary field executions. So, friends, before we fool-heartedly get involved in yet another illegal military adventure, let’s be honest with ourselves and tell the world, especially the Russians, that we intend to continue to foment revolution in their backyard and they had better get used to the idea. And then, when the Russians visit Mexico and try to overthrow that government, we too, had better get used to the idea. And by the way, why shouldn’t the Iranians stop selling oil to France and UK. It’s their oil from their land and if they don’t want to sell it to their enemies, France and UK, well, that’s their business. We don’t sell to the Iranians because we say that they are our enemies. So who is the hypocrite here?
Sarkozy a Phony, Libya a Crime and the World Liars
http://news.yahoo.com/sarkozy-advises-against-military-strike-iran-215253967.html This writer is made sick by this article. Now Sarkozy says that the solution to problems is Diplomacy, etc. ( see article). Before with Libya, he was all missiles, bombs, strafing, war and destruction of an entire sovereign nation called Libya. I have written extensively on this blog about the illegal criminal war against Libya and the Leader of the Revolution Gaddafi. Here I simply call attention to the travesty of international political phoniness by Sarkozy, Cameron, and Obama abetted by a superfluous but dangerous UN and its crony Security Council. The base line is this: The UN resolution 1973 was dead wrong and allowed to be gravely misused by Sarkozy, Obama and Cameron as they dropped at least 2000 bombs on the army, navy and air force of a UN member country called Libya. The North Atlantic Treaty Organization is not an arm of the UN. It is a war making organization parading as a defense organization. It is a throwback to the Cold War and should be disbanded for its criminal activities in Libya. Why? Because the legal government under Gaddafi was internationally recognized as the legal government and even the new puppet regime in Tripoli agrees that all contracts signed by the Gaddafi government are legal and binding!!
The Libyan government under Gaddafi was criminally attacked by NATO forces under the excuse of protecting civilians. How were the civilians being attacked. They were not. This is plain fact. However, rebellious para military forces backed by France (Sarkozy) Britain (Cameron) USA ( Obama) and aided by Belgium (?), fought against the legal government seeking its overthrown. These para military forces were without regular military organization. They were not recognizable by a regular military uniform. Their tactics of attacking the legal government forces, facilities and jurisdictions are recognized by other governments as the actions of terrorists!! [If this was the case today in USA, the law allows the Obama administration to utterly crush the military rebellion and then to hang all its leaders as traitors. (Yes, it is illegal to attempt the forced overthrow of the USA government and the penalty for such action is death.)] Yes, the US Obama administration backed the UN resolution 1973 authorizing military force against a UN member nation. The President later did not commit USA military ground troops to the overthrow of the legal sovereign government of Libya opting instead, to providing cruise missiles, Air Force plans, Navy ships, and A-10 attack planes in order to carry out the blatantly criminal aggression against the country of Libya. In a just world, (yes, this is not a just world), the criminal aggressor nations would be indicted by the UN (really!) as aggressors. They would also be indicted by the International Court at the Hague for aggression against a sovereign nation of the international community of nations and against a legal member of the United Nations and a nation recognized as legal by 101 nations. In a just world, this writer believes that all three leaders, Sarkozy, Cameron and (Nobel Peace Prize winner) Obama would be found guilty of criminal aggression and could even face charges of genocide against the Libyan people. Hey, facts are facts and the 200 plus cruise missiles, the 2000 plus air force sorties against the legal army of Libya were all carried out without a legal Declaration of War which according to international law and the USA Manual of Land Warfare and the USA Military Code of Justice constitutes lawless and wanton criminal behavior. By the way, Gaddafi did not have Weapons of Mass destruction. He did not have and was not developing any form of nuclear weapon. He was not a military or terrorist threat to the nations of the International community. Yes, he was at one time. But that had been adjudicated by international agreement, an agreement which shamefully, was completely disregarded by the Obama administration and as far as this writer knows, was not defended by former Sec. State Condi Rice nor former President George Bush!!) The legal Gaddafi government was not killing hundreds of its people daily. It was not bombing its own cities. Its jails were not overflowing with prisoners ( look at the US jails. We cannot build them fast enough!!) Yet, the UN and the NATO aggressors were allowed to brutally attack and destroy the legal government of Libya and allowed to murder the head of the Revolution, Gaddafi. This amounts not only to brutal wanton aggression but to illegal Regicide which is an odious form of assassination. All of the foregoing is very disheartening to this writer. Why? Because the Game of Nations seem to be above the law and therefore, the drones that are aimed against our supposed enemies by the USA, can be reproduced and aimed against us. But you say that our assassination drones only murder those who are guilty. Well, that is our definition of things. But when they send their drones against us, we will be defined by them as those who deserve to die without benefit of accuser, indictment, defense and trial. But you say “they” did that to “us” on 9/11. Yes, they did, the bastards! But does that mean that we too become terrorist bastards? I hope not, but the evidence of this administration and of France and Britain point to the adage that “Might makes right.” If that is the case, than we can all despair because justice does not exist and the law of the jungle reigns supreme. PS. The Menvedev regime of Russia and the Communist regime of China could have vetoed UN resultion 1973. They did not and one thinks they felt betrayed because they objected during the brutal NATO criminal aggression but did not act. Now, it is hopeful that the Russian Confederation under Putin and the Communist Chinese government will continue to successfully veto Western aggression and NATO brutality and Genocide.
England is Stll Imperialist and Colonialist
Britain, France and USA are big on Democratic gov. for Libya. Well, who elected these new guys? Nobody. They are puppets for the Western European NATO military alliance. Secondly, who unelected the government of Libya? Nobody. This new unilateral move by the tainted Cameron government is more British colonialism and reveals that Britain has no respect for African nations, for the African Union of nations or for the people of Libya. Now, after tens of thousands of bombs have pulverized the cities, roads and infrastructure of the free and sovereign State of LIbya, the Brits show their imperialist nature by claiming that through diplomatic recognition it can cast aside the legal government of Libya, steal it’s bank accounts in order to have the Libyan people pay for the British chosen new government, and impose a government acceptable to Britain on the Libyan people. This is gross liberalism and reveal the war mongering criminal aggressions and now colonialist nature of the British empire mentality. Shame on USA for being part of this mafia style take over of a whole free nation and its valuable oil assets by the big bullies of NATO. WHERE IS RUSSIA OR ARE THEY STILL COMMIES WHO WILL GO ALONG WITH THIS SHAM? How about China? They suffered terribly under British imperilism and a British colonial policy that fostered the mass addiction of the Chinese people by providing opium to Chinese people and using their mass addiction to undermine the government of China. The Brits didn’t care about the tens of thousands of innocent Chinese who died in the British sponsored opium dens of China. All they wanted then and all they want now is unfettered access to Chinese mineral resources. China should demand a stop to this criminal activity by the Western European and USA backed military partners of NATO. Strange isn’t it that a USA citizen finds himself looking to communist and former communist nations for help in stopping the new colonialism and imperialism of the West and USA!
Russia Finally Speaks Up- But Not Enough
http://news.yahoo.com/libya-rebels-fighting-capture-eastern-oil-town-013826058.html
Russia needs to call for a meeting of the United Nations Security Council. It is great that Russia has stopped being a mere stooge for Sarkozy and Obama. Maybe Putin is getting his balls back. Maybe Putin will push Medvedev aside in the next election. Maybe the only hope for a true and just settlement of the Libyan Resource war being waged by the USA Obama and the cronies, Sarkozy and Cameron, maybe the only hope is Russia. Russia has oil interests in Libya through Gazprom but while other oil interests are merely anxious to keep NATO war planes away from the Libyan Oil field, Russia has at least whispered its disapproval of the USA led war against the Libyan people. But the Russians need to push and shove and shout. They are being manipulated by the French and out witted by Obama. The Russian need to call for a security council meeting to stop the UN backed AGGRESSION. Read it again…YES…the United Nations is involved in full by condoning the brutal lying war machine of the NATO military alliance to attack the legal government and civilians of Libya. The UN seems to think that only those who fled to France during the Gaddafi years are “true” Libyans and all the other poor and non mobile Libyans who stayed and worked out practical arrangements with the regime are not real Libyans.
Russian and Chinese Still Afraid of France, Britiain and NATO
It is surprising that the Russians and the Chinese are so timid. The two international giants are cowering as Sarkozy struts across the world stage brandishing the sword of aggression. Sarkozy and the Western military war machine known as NATO are attempting to assert their dominance in oil rich Libya. It must be very disappointing to the Libyans that the Russians have not defended them. It seems that the Russian business partnership is worthless and that anyone who is a business partner with Russia should not trust them. The Chinese are just as craven as they cower before Napoleon Sarkozy by refusing to call for an immediate session of the UN Security Council in order to end the obscene Western Imperialist Aggression against Libya. This author predicts that all of these nations will pay a very dear price as the so-called “Arab Spring” turns out to be a covert operation of militant Arab extremists who are just as bad, if not worse, than the dictators they seek to replace. Note, how the leadership of the so-called rebels continues to grandly pose as being for peace but each time the Libyan government offers peace, the rebels automatically reject it as being phony.
Yes, Let’s Trust the Libyan Government and Stop the Criminal Aggression
Yes, let’s take the chance. (PS) I will comment on this article later today. Here’s the short form, How can we say to the Libyan Government that we are sincere when no matter what they do, we continue to support and arm and train and now have boots on the ground advisors teaching the rebels how to defeat the government? The western nations are being hyper hypocritical here and I wonder why Russia is allowing it? What is the secret deal the Russian President and Russian Prime Minister have cut with NATO. The Russian complicity and the German complicity in this blatant grab for oil is disgraceful. And we thought that the Germans and the Russians had reformed and were now the good guys. Wow, are we dumb!
Progressive Politics 