It is surprising that the Russians and the Chinese are so timid. The two international giants are cowering as Sarkozy struts across the world stage brandishing the sword of aggression. Sarkozy and the Western military war machine known as NATO are attempting to assert their dominance in oil rich Libya. It must be very disappointing to the Libyans that the Russians have not defended them. It seems that the Russian business partnership is worthless and that anyone who is a business partner with Russia should not trust them. The Chinese are just as craven as they cower before Napoleon Sarkozy by refusing to call for an immediate session of the UN Security Council in order to end the obscene Western Imperialist Aggression against Libya. This author predicts that all of these nations will pay a very dear price as the so-called “Arab Spring” turns out to be a covert operation of militant Arab extremists who are just as bad, if not worse, than the dictators they seek to replace. Note, how the leadership of the so-called rebels continues to grandly pose as being for peace but each time the Libyan government offers peace, the rebels automatically reject it as being phony.
Tag: Sarkozy
The Russian are now lapdogs to Obama and Sarkozy.
http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1693121,00.html
How did it happen that Sakozy became such an arch enemy of Gaddafi. This writer remembers the days when the Western Nations looked forward to welcoming Col Gaddafi and Libya into the world of modern progressive peaceful nations. Then all of a sudden we are told that Gaddai is a tyrant, a dictator and an international criminal. What did Gaddafi do? There are plenty of accepted stereotypes and a lot of allegations but we do not call in the North Altantic Treaty Organization to decimate a nation’ military, destroy it infastructure and attempt to over throw its’ government based on stereotypical anti arab prejudice and heresay allegations. This blogger has repeated opposed and constantly written against the United Nations sanctioned war of aggression against Libya and its’ legal government. I have called out NATO as a military alliance which is pursuing an illegal war of criminal aggression against Libya. Every day is a very sad day for our world because the United Nations is morally compromised by its craven cowardice is not revising its resolution 1973 by removing its complicit agreement to this aggression. This is a resource war for oil by member states against Libya. The Libyan oil resource war is evidence that the United Nations is no longer a credible agency for peace and justice in our world and that the United Nations should itself by cited by the International War crimes tribunal at the Hague for its legalization of blatant criminal aggression by its members. Sadly, the only hope for justice in the United Nations Security Council is the Russian delegate who can introduce censure and sanction resolutions against NATO and in favor of the grieviously injured people of Tripoli and all other bombed and straffed Libyan cities. But the Russians, although initially seeming to side with justice against resolution 1973, have now been sidelined by Sarkozy, Obama and Cameron. I never thought to see the day when great Russia would be reduced to a vassal for the two greatest imperialist colonialist nations of the West, France and Britain! In fact, Sarkozy is so emboldened that he recently called for a similiar resolution of power to NATO as regards Syria and Sarkozy taunts the Russians to dare to oppose him in the Security Council. Who would have ever thought to see Putin as a lap dog for Menvedev and Menvedev as a lacky for Sarkozy? Indeed, the internal situation within the sovereign nation of Syria is serious but should an interventionist colonial power like France be allowed to assert a new dominance over an Arab State like Syria. Should the Russians agree to stand idly as the NATO military alliance makes the Russian influence in the region of no significance? It is a strange twist of fate that this writer, who is an ardent pro America citizen of the USA, should be looking to a former Communist totalitarian dictatorship for the protection of the sovereignty of nations. But such is my hope as we face the new world order totalitarianism of Obama, Sarkozy and Cameron.
Sarkozy and His Friend Gaddafi Photos
http://images.search.yahoo.com/search/images?_adv_prop=image&fr=slv8-yie8&va=sarkozy%2Bgaddafi
These are Internet Photos of the “Big Boys” Sarkozy, Gaddafi and Obama. Some date back to 2007 but many are recent. Does it not amaze you that they were such public “friends” and now three of them are trying to kill the one. What did he do to them? What does he have that they want? Are Obama, Cameron and Sarkozy playing “king of the hill” using our money, our military services personnel, or ships, planes, missiles and special forces in order to topple his government and thereby to prove they are “superior” or that Europe will not give way to a “..tribal upstart from the deserts of Libya!”? Click through them yourself and see the proof in the photos. The war in Libya is dead wrong. It is an modern resource war for oil. The big boys are bullies who see Gaddafi as the weirdo kid in the group upon whom the other three can prey?
Sarkozy Could Be Guilty of Crimes Against Humanity
The French President thinks that he is safe under the phony oil war of revenge against Gaddafi. Maybe not! Others are finally stepping forward and asking about the invasion against the government of Libya. Are people finally waking up to the extensive nature of this criminal aggression by former colonialist and imperialist countries like France, Britain and Belgium. Do we as Americans really want to be known as war criminals and aggressors against Libya? During Iraq there was a great cry by the anti Bush press concerning “…his war for oil.” Now under the Pro Obama press, we have all anti Gaddafi stories highlighed. Oh, yes, the American press reports a little of the “other side” but always disparages the “Libyan Government “”Minders”” Which is to say that the people showing the reporters some NATO crime are absolutely phony and not believed. Or that the Prime Minister of Libya is just a “stooge” for Gaddafi. Or they will use other hidden code words or tones in their written reports which communicate to the audience that whatever the legal and internationally recognized government of Libya says are lies. Today we even have a so called scientific report from a doctor who gave out questionaires to women in war areas and was surprized at the vastness of the rape that has occured by Gaddafi forces. The doctor points out the similarities of all the 275 reports of rape. However, there is no attempt to medically verify such claims. This author is adamantly opposed to war and declares that rape is a horrible crime and the rapists must be apprehended. However, the story of itself is troubling. That is to say this: There is enough social cohesion still remaining in Libya that such a written survery could be conducted? There is enough government contolled secure areas where a survey specialist could work in safety? The survey forms could be handed out in Arabic, filled out by Libyan citizens whose hushands had been tied up, their children and husband forced to view the women being raped repeatedly, then her husband and children executed in front of her! This is horrendous. This is horrible. This must be thoroughly investigatged, the murdered husbands and children found and the women given immediate medical and psychiatric examination and hospital care. Surely these 275 women must be hospitalized, their husbands and children recovered from the rubble where their murdered and mangled bodies lie in blood and dirt. They must be given proper burials and their murders chronicled by NATO legal teams so that they can have their day in court and justice served. But I hear someone say, that cannot be done because of the chaos of war! Then how was the survey conducted and the crimes reported and how did these horrible murders become known to researchers in Libya?
IMF Guy, Political Brutality in the Public Square
IMF chief is arrested and this really important guy goes to an ordinary jail cell at the precinct. Wow! And he is a leading contender against Sarkozy for President of France and no body knows who he is and nobody cares, including the French, American, German, and British embassies. I guess they just thought to let the guy rot in jail. Then he is arraigned before a magistrate and denied bail! An amazing judgement when so many other “hollywood types” get bail? So they cart his @!@ off to Riker’s Island and keep him under very close scrutiny for ever minute so that the guy cannot take a dump without somebody watching. They said it was for fear of suicide or was it because they didn’t want him talking to anybody, calling anybody or the like? Then we read repeated statements (even from the US Government) that the accused, (who under our law is innocent until PROVEN guilty) – that he absolutely must resign his high power, prestigious, and internationally important job. So, as he languishes in Riker’s with the pimps, the perps, the bashers, bunglers and other bums, this guy is informed that maybe he will still be denied bail. He pleads for release and offers very stringent rules for himself. Still not enough. Then he finally agrees to resign his job and suddenly, like magic, he is granted bail. Meanwhile the NYC detectives are scouring the hotel room, cutting up pieces of the carpet in search of semen samples and otherwise spending an enormous amount of our Tax dollars in order to PROVE that they are right and this guy is a rapist? (I don’t think the LA police did that much for Nicole Simson) while her husband was riding his car all along the Freeway? And how quaint it is that at the exact same time that all this is happening, his rival for the Presidency of France announces that he and his lovely domesticated wife are having a baby and so they pose for photos as the perfect humble domestic French citizens while this guy is photographed as a thug, a rapist, and a criminal who forces himself on the poorest of the poor and the most helpless of the helpless. As a novelist, I could never have thought this stuff up but I wholeheartedly believe that politicians can!! Folks, I don’t care about this guy. But I watch out for myself and my children and grandchildren. And since all of them are part of the USA system, I am very vigilant about what that system does and is allowed to do. Now, I must wonder that if I am right and this is a political murder carried out in the public square using the forces of the system to destroy a political enemy– well, if the system can so easily be abused against the powerful, then I fear of what it is capable of being used to do against me and mine. Therefore, unlike the mob of pundits in the news who want this guy’s head on a spike, I want every single effort made to defend him, protect him from political murder and to prove him innocent (if he is innocent). Why? Because I thereby protect myself when my enemy accuses me of a crime that is very hard to disprove. I mean they were smart enough not to have the maid raped only attempted rape. At least in a rape you have the brutality to the body that is easily proved in such a short time. No, this is only attempted rape, one person’s word against another’s, with the police scouring the carpet for semen!! As a juror, such proof only indicates that he spilled himself onto the carpet! (forgive the bluntness of the statement but this is serious stuff.) So what now? Well, we spend a lot of time and a lot of money to prove to ourselves, (by the way is it clear that we little people are the victims in all of this as our rights are limited, our civil security forces used for political purposes and our taxes spent on a trial to prove to us we were right.) All the while, the perpetrators of this travesty are satisfied and have already moved on because their goal has been accomplished. This man is disgraced, he has resigned and his enormous power destroyed. Could it happen to us? Yes, it can and that is the only reason I am writing an approach to all of this that is plausible and must be considered.
Progressive Politics 