What went wrong with Boehner and how to fix it.

http://news.yahoo.com/debt-limit-vote-postponed-gop-seeks-support-223001521.html;_ylt=As7OO69bLhvtQprEFxd.Wves0NUE;_ylu=X3oDMTNwZjN0YjZhBGNjb2RlA3dlaWdodGVkY3QEcGtnAzdhYTQ0YTlhLWZmMTItM2RjZC05ZjBjLTUwNTQ4NWFmMDA4ZARwb3MDMQRzZWMDbW9zdF9wb3B1bGFyBHZlcgNjM2ViN2Q5MC1iOTc0LTExZTAtYmZkZi1iNjQwZjMwOWNjOGU-;_ylg=X3oDMTFpNzk0NjhtBGludGwDdXMEbGFuZwNlbi11cwRwc3RhaWQDBHBzdGNhdANob21lBHB0A3NlY3Rpb25z;_ylv=3

A good American and a fine Speaker made a serious but not fatal mistake yesterday.  John Boehner forget his own principles.  He strong armed and brow beat his fellow Representatives just like Nancy Pelosi did.  These freshmen Congress members campaigned on the platform of a New and Fresh Change in the way business is conducted in the Capitol.  They are people of philosophical and political conviction who believe what they say.  They are not phonies who talk one way and act another way.  They are sincere members of Congress who intend to stand upon their principles and to work very hard at making those principles serve the good health of the nation.  Either John Boehner, and Eric Cantor forgot that or they simply got caught up in the frenzy of the political moment.  Either way, that it happened is a little sad, but not too much.  Rather, it is a bold indicator that politics as usual in Washington has ended and that a new and more enlightened time has come to our Capitol.

The so-called “Tea Party” backed freshmen Representatives are not to be bought.  They remember the episodes with Mary Landrue and the so-called “Louisiana purchase. (When Congressperson Landrue accepted what was basically a 300 million dollars earmark for her State in return for her vote in favor of the Obama care.)  The conservative members of Congress remember that the 60th vote in the Senate came from Ben Nelson of Nebraska when he too accepted a mega earmark of money for his state in return for his vote.  People were appalled by the purchase of votes by the Obama/Pelosi people and they promised the voter’s back home that they would not do that.  Well, the freshmen and other Congresspersons kept their word and would not be threatened, bullied or bought into voting for a Bill that they did not want.

This is a great day for America and a day for which we should be thankful.  The cynical opinion of the population is that Washington can never be changed.  Many had began to abandon all hope for integrity among our leadership.  Last night’s stand up refusal by the members of the House of Representatives is an affirmation that America is still strong, still brave and still free.  Freedom was heralded last night in the halls of the House of Representatives.  Integrity was affirmed last night in the office of the Majority whip and the Speaker.  The people we elected to represent us and not themselves, did so and did it with courage.

This is not grid lock.  This is not dysfunction.  This is democracy at work.  I know that a lot of people talk about democracy but they do not like the effort involved in making it work.  But “freedom is not free”.  That slogan is often used regarding our military and the need to defend freedom in Iraq or Afghanistan or Libya.  But we need freedom at home, in the USA.  The stance of the Republican conservatives last night was a Patriotic act by sensible, intelligent, responsible, Representatives and they should be applauded and not vilified.

So what to do today?  This writer believes in Speaker Boehner.  He did his best to do what he thought was best.  He was mistaken.  His true stature will be decided today as he meets again with his fellow Representatives.  People whom he has declared and I know he believes are fully and completely his equals.  It will be his respect for this equality that will win the day.  I believe the Speaker should acknowledge that he was not reflective of the will of the Congress.  I believe that he should admit that he too like others was caught up in the frenzy created by Timothy Geithner and Barrack Obama.  He should then ask his fellow congress persons to work diligently with him, yet again, to craft a workable compromise bill that will serve the nation.  For myself, I think that he should acknowledge to those members who we believe he tried to bully that he was sorry about that and ask them for their understanding of his zealous and well-intentioned patriotism because he wanted to do the “right thing.”

Then I believe that Calm and Reasonable Reflection should be mandated.  We already know that August 2nd is a false deadline.  The Treasury has admitted that they have enough money already on hand to pay our debts.  The Social Security Administration has admitted that they have enough Treasury Bonds in the Vaults that will cover payments to Social Security recipients for more than a decade (not counting yearly revenue) ! So we need to stop, regroup, reflect and renew our efforts to create  significant legislation that honestly and realistically tackles the short term need and the long-term problem of our national debt.  For this writer this period of calm should include a day off of work and for those inclined, a day at their respective house of worship.

Do we need a new Speaker?  No.  Not over a tactical error.  Generals make tactical errors all the time. Will we need a new Speaker in the future?  Maybe, if Speaker Boehner continues a strategy that stereotypes duly elected members of Congress as Teapartiers!  If the Majority Whip continues to use the strategy of “Arm Twisting” instead of persuasion using rational and philosophically and politically reasonable argument.  The new climate among the newly elected members of Congress is a volcanic shift in thinking and in practice.  They are not interested in power.  They are interested in reasoned and practical solutions to our national problems starting today and not in ten years.

My hope is that the Speaker and the Majority whip and other old line Representatives will Get it straight, and they may yet save the day.

One last thought.  “The one who makes the rules, wins the game.”  Realistically, it is still the House and the Senate that make the rules.  Obama has not played by the rules but forced new rules on the Congress.  Last night said to the President, who has himself repeatedly name called, criticized and vilified the members of the House of Representatives, “No, Mr. President.  It is not our job to do your job for you. And you will not scare us and bully us and threaten us from the White House. “

Speaker Boehner is the Right Man for a Time Such as This

Boehner Stands Firm

 

 

Monday, 25 Jul 2011 02:50 PM

By Christopher Ruddy

 

Share:
More . . .
A    A   |
   Email Us   |
   Print   |

 

<!–

–>

As the
Aug. 2 debt-ceiling deadline looms, we should applaud House Speaker John Boehner
for standing firm and not being rolled over by those in the White House and
their media campaign.

Boehner has not yielded to demands for new taxes
and reducing spending cuts. Nor has he acquiesced to demands that the president
be given carte blanche to raise the debt ceiling in the future.

john boehner, barack obama, debt ceiling
Boehner

Ever since the GOP
took control of the House, the president’s approach has been, at worst, one of
willful opposition to new ideas and, at best, simple indifference to fixing the
nation’s problems. Obama and his spin machine now say they need a debt ceiling
agreed to through the next election. Giving him this may not be wise. The debt
ceiling has served as a mighty lever to bring Obama to the table.

Make
no mistake about it — Obama is not Bill Clinton. Obama doesn’t believe in
compromise. When Clinton was faced with a new Republican Congress in 1995, he
did a 180-degree turn on many of his agenda items. He embraced Republican ideas
like massive welfare reform and even slashed capital gains taxes. The system of
give and take and compromise worked and propelled the nation into economic
prosperity.

Compare that to today: The president seems to want it his
way or no way.

Perhaps politics is playing a big role here. Obama is
trying to placate his liberal base, which is angry with him. He won the last
election by promising radical changes in foreign policy, especially when it came
to U.S. policy toward Iraq, Afghanistan, and Iran. He defeated Hillary Clinton
largely on these issues.

Frankly, since coming to office, Obama has
gravitated to the center on foreign policy and has done a fairly good job in
that arena. He has kept seasoned veterans in key positions and his recent moves
of Gen. David Petraeus to the CIA, and Leon Panetta, former CIA director, to the
Defense Department, were brilliant.

No longer able to play the
foreign policy card as he did during the campaign, the president has been
focusing on those “evil House Republicans” to keep the liberals
happy.

One hot-button issue for his base is taxes. The president wants to
prove to his liberal base he’s going to go after the wealthy and make them pay.

The problem is that the economy cannot handle new taxes. Speaker Boehner
is to be commended for arguing three simple points: 1. The debt ceiling should
not be raised to allow the president a free ride until after the 2012 election.
2. There should be no additional “revenues” or tax increases. 3. There needs to
be serious spending cuts.

For the most part these spending cuts are not
immediate cuts to the federal budget, but are cuts to the rate of growth of
government, a sensible approach taken by both Ronald Reagan and Clinton that
dramatically improved the country’s finances during the 1980s and ’90s.

Nevertheless, Obama is dead set on new taxes. The Democrats have claimed
that such tax increases could be made by closing corporate loopholes and making
the tax system more fair for everyone.

At first glance, it seems like a
positive idea. But the net effect of this effort, advocated in the Gang of Six’s
plan, is to raise taxes over by an additional $1 trillion in new taxes. This tax
money will be taken from the private sector and moved into government accounts.

Such a move would be counterproductive. First, new taxes will only help
stall the economic recovery. Second, the economy desperately needs new stimulus,
not new taxes.

Obama and his advisers must know this. His 2009 stimulus
plan was not well planned out and only did half the job. True, it kept the
economy from falling off the cliff. At the same time his stimulus, focused on
keeping government employees at work, never gave the economy the appropriate
lift that it needed.

Republicans favor tax cuts, and I believe they
would likely do a deal for more of them.

If Obama did deal — let’s say
for a one-year holiday suspension of the FICA tax for all workers and small
businesses, it would mean more than $600 billion in additional stimulus
immediately put into the economy over the next 12 months.

This would not
only re-energize the entire U.S. economy, it would finally signal a move by
Obama to the center in a powerful way, helping to pave the way for his
re-election.

Can Obama be so bold? As the debt crisis has demonstrated,
the president is preoccupied by his party’s liberal base. The truth is they have
nowhere to go in the next election.

Instead, Obama should follow
Boehner’s path, a pragmatic approach, one that keeps the United States solvent
for now and for years to come.© Newsmax. All rights reserved.

Read more on
Newsmax.com: Boehner
Stands Firm

Important: Do You Support Pres. Obama’s Re-Election? Vote Here Now!