China to Take Trillions from America

http://pro.stansberryresearch.com/1202CHINAGLD/EOILN206/?o=621625&s=625964&u=50056120&l=388320&r=Milo

 

This article was sent to me via e-mail and I share it with you because I have read Porter Stanberry and he is very often right on target.  He is not a prophet nor the son of a prophet but he does considerable research on the financial markets and his world view is large enough to allow him to see major trends before they are obvious to the general public.  Of late Porter has been very worried about the welfare of the US citizen and the financial future of our nation. He is a red-blooded America and he loves his country.  However, his projections are dire warnings that we need to be more business like in our government.  Read what he has to say.

Sarkozy a Phony, Libya a Crime and the World Liars

http://news.yahoo.com/sarkozy-advises-against-military-strike-iran-215253967.html  This writer is made sick by this article.  Now Sarkozy says that the solution to problems is Diplomacy, etc. ( see article).  Before with Libya, he was all missiles, bombs, strafing, war and destruction of an entire sovereign nation called Libya.  I have written extensively on this blog about the illegal criminal war against Libya and the Leader of the Revolution Gaddafi.  Here I simply call attention to the travesty of international political phoniness by Sarkozy, Cameron, and Obama abetted by a superfluous but dangerous UN and its crony Security Council.  The base line is this:  The UN resolution 1973 was dead wrong and allowed to be gravely misused by Sarkozy, Obama and Cameron as they dropped at least 2000 bombs on the army, navy and air force of a UN member country called Libya.  The North Atlantic Treaty Organization is not an arm of the UN.  It is a war making organization parading as a defense organization. It is a throwback to the Cold War and should be disbanded for its criminal activities in Libya. Why? Because the legal government under Gaddafi was internationally recognized as the legal government and even the new puppet regime in Tripoli agrees that all contracts signed by the Gaddafi government are legal and binding!!

The Libyan government under Gaddafi was criminally attacked by NATO forces under the excuse of protecting civilians.  How were the civilians being attacked.  They were not. This is plain fact.  However, rebellious para military forces backed by France (Sarkozy) Britain (Cameron) USA ( Obama) and aided by Belgium (?), fought against the legal government seeking its overthrown.  These para military forces were without regular military organization. They were not recognizable by a regular military uniform. Their tactics of attacking the legal government forces, facilities and jurisdictions are recognized by other governments as the actions of terrorists!!  [If this was the case today in USA, the law allows the Obama administration to utterly crush the military rebellion and then to hang all its leaders as traitors. (Yes, it is illegal to attempt the forced overthrow of the USA government and the penalty for such action is death.)] Yes, the US Obama administration backed the UN resolution 1973 authorizing military force against a UN member nation. The President later did not commit USA military ground troops to the overthrow of the legal sovereign government of Libya opting instead, to providing cruise missiles, Air Force plans, Navy ships, and A-10 attack planes in order to carry out the blatantly criminal aggression against the country of Libya.  In a just world, (yes, this is not a just world), the criminal aggressor nations would be indicted by the UN (really!) as aggressors.  They would also be indicted by the International Court at the Hague for aggression against a sovereign nation of the international community of nations and against a legal member of the United Nations and a nation recognized as legal by 101 nations.  In a just world, this writer believes that all three leaders, Sarkozy, Cameron and (Nobel Peace Prize winner) Obama would be found guilty of criminal aggression and could even face charges of genocide against the Libyan people.  Hey, facts are facts and the 200 plus cruise missiles, the 2000 plus air force sorties against the legal army of Libya were all carried out without a legal Declaration of War which according to international law and the USA Manual of Land Warfare and the USA Military Code of Justice constitutes lawless and wanton criminal behavior.   By the way, Gaddafi did not have Weapons of Mass destruction.  He did not have and was not developing any form of nuclear weapon. He was not a military or terrorist threat to the nations of the International community.  Yes, he was at one time. But that had been adjudicated by international agreement, an agreement which shamefully, was completely disregarded by the Obama administration and as far as this writer knows, was not defended by former Sec. State Condi Rice nor former President George Bush!!)  The legal Gaddafi government was not killing hundreds of its people daily.  It was not bombing its own cities.  Its jails were not overflowing with prisoners ( look at the US jails. We cannot build them fast enough!!) Yet, the UN and the NATO aggressors were allowed to brutally attack and destroy the legal government of Libya and allowed to murder the head of the Revolution, Gaddafi.  This amounts not only to brutal wanton aggression but to illegal Regicide which is an odious form of assassination.  All of the foregoing is very disheartening to this writer.  Why? Because the Game of Nations seem to be above the law and therefore, the drones that are aimed against our supposed enemies by the USA, can be reproduced and aimed against us.  But you say that our assassination drones only murder those who are guilty.  Well, that is our definition of things.  But when they send their drones against us, we will be defined by them as those who deserve to die without benefit of accuser, indictment, defense and trial.  But you say “they” did that to “us” on 9/11.  Yes, they did, the bastards!  But does that mean that we too become terrorist bastards?  I hope not,  but the evidence of this administration and of France and Britain point to the adage that “Might makes right.”  If that is the case, than we can all despair because justice does not exist and the law of the jungle reigns supreme.   PS. The Menvedev regime of Russia and the Communist regime of China could have vetoed UN resultion 1973.  They did not and one thinks they felt betrayed because they objected during the brutal NATO criminal aggression but did not act.  Now, it is hopeful that the Russian Confederation under Putin and the Communist Chinese government will continue to successfully veto Western aggression and NATO brutality and Genocide.

Komen and Planned Parenthood- the case for fairness

This article indicates a very serious crisis in American Journalism.  The writer is allowed to use an anonymous source to contradict the open statements of an identified and verifiable source.  The person featured in this article is known, her credentials are known, her position in the organization is known, and if there were audio or print copies of board conversations, her exact words would be known.  Yet, the writer is allowed to contradict the featured person at every turn by citing a supposed anonymous source.  This source falls under the so-called “protected source, or whistle-blower” concept.  But the use of this so-called source is very open to gross abuse by the reporter.  We have absolutely no information about the so-called source. We don’t know if the source is the VP of human resources, the Exe. Director of funding or the window washer or the Mail room clerk, or even the figment of the reporters imagination.  So, let’s be fair here.  If I were a juror and this were a court case, I would find in favor of the defendant against the so-called “insider source.” Why? Because the law allows the accused to face their accuser.  Without this face to face confrontation, anybody could accuse anyone of anything and actually get away with it if the press agreed with the secret accuser against the public defendant.  Also, as a juror, I would be thinking of my own freedom and rights as I found in favor of the public defendant against the cowardly contra-witness.  The public officials named in this article are accountable but we are supposed to hold a voice from the dark to have credibility because , “…they feared reprisal.”  Well, such  non accountability is something this writer strongly condemns as dangerous to his own freedom.  And I believe it is dangerous to yours as well.

Can US Survive The Government’s Credit Card Mentality?

What follows are facts. Nothing in this essay will be conjecture or opinion. I will make no forecast – at least not in this essay. So please, stop the political name-calling… and grow up. The problems we face are ours. All of ours. It doesn’t matter how we got here. It only matters that we begin to deal with these issues – soon. If we don’t begin to solve these core financial problems, they will certainly destroy our country.
Today, our national federal debt far exceeds $15 trillion. This alone is not a serious problem. The interest we pay on these debts is small – thanks to the trust of our creditors, who, for the moment, continue to believe America is a safe bet.
So… what’s the problem? The main problem is the amount of debt we owe continues to increase at a faster and faster pace. This is exceptionally dangerous for two simple reasons. First, there’s simple math. When numbers compound, the result is geometric expansion. And that’s happening right now with our national debt because we continue to borrow money to pay the interest. And we have done so for about 40 years. Think about it this way: How big would your debts be today if you’d been using credit cards to pay your mortgage for the last several decades?
Even worse, our debts are compounding at an accelerating pace because we lack the political ability to limit the federal government’s spending. Please understand… I’m not pointing the finger at any politician or either political party. I’m simply pointing out a fact: This year’s $3.6 trillion federal budget is 20% larger than the entire 2008 budget. And while our government has grown at a record pace, our economy hasn’t. It has hardly grown at all. Thus, this will be the fourth year in a row we set a record for deficit spending. Never before in peacetime has our government borrowed this much money. And now, it’s borrowing record amounts every year.

Is it OK for a Black Man to be a Racist?

http://news.yahoo.com/radio-host-loses-female-gop-candidate-stupid-m-164432955.html?ugccmtnav=v1%2Fcomments%2Fcontext%2Fad439fd0-da0e-3cbd-8def-d68938598f5f%2Fcomments%3Fcount%3D20%26sortBy%3DhighestRated%26isNext%3Dtrue%26offset%3D20%26pageNumber%3D1#

This racist event is bad enough.  But I am also amazed at the silence of the women’s movement.  Where is the outrage?  I guess it is okay for a black man to verbally abuse a black woman?  There was more outcry over the Komem organization denying 500 thousand dollars to Planned Parenthood, then over this outrage.  I suppose we could just bury this story and forget the talk show host.  However, wrong is wrong and this is wrong.  Another amazing thing is reading the comments made by viewers of this article.  They seemed to me to laugh this off, to excuse the behavior as idiotic or stupid but not racist.  Is it because it is not politically or socially safe to name this guy what he is, namely, a racist?  Of course he could have done all of this for effect in order to catapult himself into headlines and take his tiny radio program stellar. Nonetheless, this kind of hate speech and verbal abuse is shown for what it is, violence parading as outrage.  It must not be rewarded.

Will US Admin and US Congress Condemn Sudan

http://www.newsmax.com/TheWire/Sudan-Graham-Heiban-Bible/2012/02/02/id/428361

The question is: Will the US Government and the US Congress condemn the government of Sudan for bombing a Christian Bible College? The US Obama government backed uprisings against Mubarak in Eqypt even though it was suspected the results would be persecution of innocent Christians.  Subsequent events in Egypt proved that not only innocent Christians are persecuted but also moderate Muslims and social activities.  In Libya, the US Obama administration backed the wonton and wholesale bombing of the Sovereign government of Gaddaffi even though it was suspected that the NTC rebels were a front for European colonalist and imperialist powers.  The results have proven the colonialist and imperialist takeover is now threatened by an Islamic fundamentalist extremism that persecutes Sufi Muslims and Ethnic Christians.  In Tunisia, the US Obama administration hailed and supposrted the “Arab Spring” which is now instituting strict Islamic religious (Sharia) law upon a moderate Moslem population.  Now we have the government of Sudan using its air force to bomb and destroy a Christian Bible College.  The Obama Administration and the US Congress must not only condemn this action but also raise the issue at the United Nations of Islamic genocide against Christians.

Can Obama “order” the Congress to do as he says?

Live video and blog: Obama promotes tax reform

“”The president orders his political adversaries in Congress to pass a fair tax plan for all Americans.”

  I am very worried about democracy and freedom in the USA.  The above quote which is the sub heading for the article betrays an awful opinion by the writer.  The President of the USA does not have the Constitutional right to “order” the congress to do anything.  This is a Constitutional democracy and not a dictatorship.  Seems like the news reporter and the editor that approved the subheading feel that Obama either already has or should be given dictatorial powers to “order” people to do things.  Such thinking on the part of our “free” press is a very sad commentary upon the future of freedom in USA.

The End of Anti Gaddalfi brings Light on Sarkozy and Cameron-(War criminals?)

http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=28493  This blog  opposed President Obama, Sarkozy and Cameron because their so-called humanitarian attack against Libya was a War Crime and by extension a War against Humanity.  Now respected French politicians and researchers uncover the true nature of the criminal UN sponsored war against a member State.  A very sad story of betrayed and one small man’s vanity which destroyed a free nation.

Hopkins an Individual inside of Society

http://news.yahoo.com/47-hopkins-knows-end-finally-near-050257090–boxing.html  Today seems to be the day for great stories of individuals who stand out for their individuality while remaining inside society.  All the stories featured today involve persons who are variously thrown out of the “normal” society and yet, they barge back into that society and thereby make the society that rejected them, bigger.  Wonderful reading.