China to Take Trillions from America

http://pro.stansberryresearch.com/1202CHINAGLD/EOILN206/?o=621625&s=625964&u=50056120&l=388320&r=Milo

 

This article was sent to me via e-mail and I share it with you because I have read Porter Stanberry and he is very often right on target.  He is not a prophet nor the son of a prophet but he does considerable research on the financial markets and his world view is large enough to allow him to see major trends before they are obvious to the general public.  Of late Porter has been very worried about the welfare of the US citizen and the financial future of our nation. He is a red-blooded America and he loves his country.  However, his projections are dire warnings that we need to be more business like in our government.  Read what he has to say.

Sarkozy a Phony, Libya a Crime and the World Liars

http://news.yahoo.com/sarkozy-advises-against-military-strike-iran-215253967.html  This writer is made sick by this article.  Now Sarkozy says that the solution to problems is Diplomacy, etc. ( see article).  Before with Libya, he was all missiles, bombs, strafing, war and destruction of an entire sovereign nation called Libya.  I have written extensively on this blog about the illegal criminal war against Libya and the Leader of the Revolution Gaddafi.  Here I simply call attention to the travesty of international political phoniness by Sarkozy, Cameron, and Obama abetted by a superfluous but dangerous UN and its crony Security Council.  The base line is this:  The UN resolution 1973 was dead wrong and allowed to be gravely misused by Sarkozy, Obama and Cameron as they dropped at least 2000 bombs on the army, navy and air force of a UN member country called Libya.  The North Atlantic Treaty Organization is not an arm of the UN.  It is a war making organization parading as a defense organization. It is a throwback to the Cold War and should be disbanded for its criminal activities in Libya. Why? Because the legal government under Gaddafi was internationally recognized as the legal government and even the new puppet regime in Tripoli agrees that all contracts signed by the Gaddafi government are legal and binding!!

The Libyan government under Gaddafi was criminally attacked by NATO forces under the excuse of protecting civilians.  How were the civilians being attacked.  They were not. This is plain fact.  However, rebellious para military forces backed by France (Sarkozy) Britain (Cameron) USA ( Obama) and aided by Belgium (?), fought against the legal government seeking its overthrown.  These para military forces were without regular military organization. They were not recognizable by a regular military uniform. Their tactics of attacking the legal government forces, facilities and jurisdictions are recognized by other governments as the actions of terrorists!!  [If this was the case today in USA, the law allows the Obama administration to utterly crush the military rebellion and then to hang all its leaders as traitors. (Yes, it is illegal to attempt the forced overthrow of the USA government and the penalty for such action is death.)] Yes, the US Obama administration backed the UN resolution 1973 authorizing military force against a UN member nation. The President later did not commit USA military ground troops to the overthrow of the legal sovereign government of Libya opting instead, to providing cruise missiles, Air Force plans, Navy ships, and A-10 attack planes in order to carry out the blatantly criminal aggression against the country of Libya.  In a just world, (yes, this is not a just world), the criminal aggressor nations would be indicted by the UN (really!) as aggressors.  They would also be indicted by the International Court at the Hague for aggression against a sovereign nation of the international community of nations and against a legal member of the United Nations and a nation recognized as legal by 101 nations.  In a just world, this writer believes that all three leaders, Sarkozy, Cameron and (Nobel Peace Prize winner) Obama would be found guilty of criminal aggression and could even face charges of genocide against the Libyan people.  Hey, facts are facts and the 200 plus cruise missiles, the 2000 plus air force sorties against the legal army of Libya were all carried out without a legal Declaration of War which according to international law and the USA Manual of Land Warfare and the USA Military Code of Justice constitutes lawless and wanton criminal behavior.   By the way, Gaddafi did not have Weapons of Mass destruction.  He did not have and was not developing any form of nuclear weapon. He was not a military or terrorist threat to the nations of the International community.  Yes, he was at one time. But that had been adjudicated by international agreement, an agreement which shamefully, was completely disregarded by the Obama administration and as far as this writer knows, was not defended by former Sec. State Condi Rice nor former President George Bush!!)  The legal Gaddafi government was not killing hundreds of its people daily.  It was not bombing its own cities.  Its jails were not overflowing with prisoners ( look at the US jails. We cannot build them fast enough!!) Yet, the UN and the NATO aggressors were allowed to brutally attack and destroy the legal government of Libya and allowed to murder the head of the Revolution, Gaddafi.  This amounts not only to brutal wanton aggression but to illegal Regicide which is an odious form of assassination.  All of the foregoing is very disheartening to this writer.  Why? Because the Game of Nations seem to be above the law and therefore, the drones that are aimed against our supposed enemies by the USA, can be reproduced and aimed against us.  But you say that our assassination drones only murder those who are guilty.  Well, that is our definition of things.  But when they send their drones against us, we will be defined by them as those who deserve to die without benefit of accuser, indictment, defense and trial.  But you say “they” did that to “us” on 9/11.  Yes, they did, the bastards!  But does that mean that we too become terrorist bastards?  I hope not,  but the evidence of this administration and of France and Britain point to the adage that “Might makes right.”  If that is the case, than we can all despair because justice does not exist and the law of the jungle reigns supreme.   PS. The Menvedev regime of Russia and the Communist regime of China could have vetoed UN resultion 1973.  They did not and one thinks they felt betrayed because they objected during the brutal NATO criminal aggression but did not act.  Now, it is hopeful that the Russian Confederation under Putin and the Communist Chinese government will continue to successfully veto Western aggression and NATO brutality and Genocide.

Will US Admin and US Congress Condemn Sudan

http://www.newsmax.com/TheWire/Sudan-Graham-Heiban-Bible/2012/02/02/id/428361

The question is: Will the US Government and the US Congress condemn the government of Sudan for bombing a Christian Bible College? The US Obama government backed uprisings against Mubarak in Eqypt even though it was suspected the results would be persecution of innocent Christians.  Subsequent events in Egypt proved that not only innocent Christians are persecuted but also moderate Muslims and social activities.  In Libya, the US Obama administration backed the wonton and wholesale bombing of the Sovereign government of Gaddaffi even though it was suspected that the NTC rebels were a front for European colonalist and imperialist powers.  The results have proven the colonialist and imperialist takeover is now threatened by an Islamic fundamentalist extremism that persecutes Sufi Muslims and Ethnic Christians.  In Tunisia, the US Obama administration hailed and supposrted the “Arab Spring” which is now instituting strict Islamic religious (Sharia) law upon a moderate Moslem population.  Now we have the government of Sudan using its air force to bomb and destroy a Christian Bible College.  The Obama Administration and the US Congress must not only condemn this action but also raise the issue at the United Nations of Islamic genocide against Christians.

Can Obama “order” the Congress to do as he says?

Live video and blog: Obama promotes tax reform

“”The president orders his political adversaries in Congress to pass a fair tax plan for all Americans.”

  I am very worried about democracy and freedom in the USA.  The above quote which is the sub heading for the article betrays an awful opinion by the writer.  The President of the USA does not have the Constitutional right to “order” the congress to do anything.  This is a Constitutional democracy and not a dictatorship.  Seems like the news reporter and the editor that approved the subheading feel that Obama either already has or should be given dictatorial powers to “order” people to do things.  Such thinking on the part of our “free” press is a very sad commentary upon the future of freedom in USA.

The Loving Story

http://shine.yahoo.com/love-sex/tender-photos-unearthed-turbulent-time-235100316.html  This story says all that needs to be said.  I had never heard of the Lovings, but I read their story today.   It is a beautiful story of people in love and people who for that love will give to each other and stand up against those who get in the way of that love.  Wonderfully, it is a “loving” story.  Yes there is racism.  Yes, there is stupidity. And yes, there is cruelty.  But the Lovings are the real story. The others who acted against them are best discounted in favor of a positive approach and a grateful one.  The Lovings show us all how to love.  I love it.

Obama’s Parenting is not the Issue

http://news.yahoo.com/obama-blames-gop-failure-hit-d-c-social-140554699.html Obama makes a statement during this interview that he is a father and a parent and that his obligation to his family keeps him away from the “…Washington social scene.”  This is absurd. The WH is one big party after another starting with the big fantasy party for the Hollywood actors which he kept hidden for fear of public criticism.  Obama is the golfing, basketball, party, vacation, President.  So, in this writers opinion, such a claim by the President is just plain silly.

However, the bigger issue is President Obama’s continued refusal to see his own, “I will veto it.” stance as the problem.  Again and Again, the President says that he will not sign any legislation that does not give him exactly what he wants.  He has also repeatedly refused to implement legislation that he does not like and retards progress on other programs that would employ Americans.  His refusal of the oil pipeline deal with Canada is the latest example of his personal intervention to block progress.

We need to add that his own Democrat Party under former Speaker Nancy Pelosi refused to allow anything to get done exept his Obama Care legislation which consumed the energy of the Congress totally during his first two years.  The Democrats refused to propose a Budget. They refused  to hold examination hearings of  any (there actually were a few) appointments by Obama. They tabled (a form of refusal to talk about something) any legislation that might take time away from the Obama Agenda.  All of the Democrat actions in the Congress have been to block anything Republican and that was the cause of Congressional gridlock.  I remember Greta Van Sustern asking Rep. Paul Ryan if Speaker Pelosi ever talked to him or any other Republican during her term. His answer was a blunt, “…No she does not speak with us, only very occasionally through intermediaries and the public press conference…”

Then and now, we also need to remember the Senate Majority leader Harry Reid’s weekly refrain of “Dead on Arrival” for every piece of Republican sponsored legislation sent to him by the House of Representatives.

Add it up.  Democrat Nancy Pelosi does not even bother to talk to the Republicans. Democrat Harry Reid says about their proposals, ” Dead on Arrival.”  And President Obama says about their legislative agenda, “I’ll veto it.”  So, who is responsible for such poor relations with Congress?  Surely, any alert person can add many more public statements by Democrat leaders which indicate that the Republicans had better do it the Democrat way or forget about getting anything done.  By the way, I think the Pelosi House of Reps did not propose or pass any budget during her term.  Also, I think that it is now over nine hundred days since the Democrats in the Senate have proposed a budget.

President Obama would do much better for the nation if he would stop partying, stop golfing, stop B Balling, stop vacationing, and stay home with the kids.  Maybe then he could get some office work done and stop leaving the running of the government to Valerie Jarrett.

Interpol and Gadalfi

http://news.yahoo.com/gadhafi-son-denies-interpol-allegations-170354685.html

I have gotten a lot of flak for my defense of the Libyan Government.  And YES it is still the Libyan government recognized, until France and Britain and the USA waged wage against it, bombed its cities and its citizens into submission and imposed its own Paris based (read the history of these guys.please) puppet goverment it   yes, I am disgusted by the lemming nature of USA people to buy into the propaganda of the news media. For instance, the media says it found the grave of one thousand convicts slain by the Libyan government but this is not affirmed by the International Red Cross and other agencies, therefore in admissible ..hey fair is fair…Cameron and Sarkozy have the gall to fly to Libya in a show of victory over the legal government of Libya…how did they win, they won by deception and conspiracy with the United Nations to save the civilians of Libya while they actually used the cover of resolution 1973 to wage brutal illegal aggression against Libya and bombed and destroyed the cities and roads and infrastructure of a modern Libya, WHY…OIL, OIL,  OIL..Get real… And the Western secular governments of France and Britain and the USA have used every “legal” tactic to dis credit the legal Libyan government of Gadalfi…hey, I am NOT a fan of the man, but facts are facts, and this writer does not buy the propaganda of lazy lamestream media reporters who never leave their safe hotels rather they report from the drinking bar…get real folks that is what is happening…And now, we have foolish Senator Mc Cain running to Libya on the American taxpayers back and having him proclaim that we, (translated to mean the American Taxpayer) must be committed to the so-called revolutionary government …(translate that to mean that the US Congress is going to send billions of US tax dollars to Libya).  Now maybe, if the billions of US tax dollars could be shown to feed the hungry and clothe the naked and house the homeless, Okay!  But let’s get real. The billions will be used to increase the bank accounts of the new rulers of Libya and fill their Paris based coffers with American gold while we in USA are jobless and under Obama, becoming homeless.

Obama Jobs Speech is Phony

http://news.yahoo.com/obama-slams-republicans-west-coast-money-swing-042354630.html

We keep reading about the President going here and there aboard Air Force One.  These are not affairs of State.  All reporters acknowledge that the travels are political fund-raisers and that the trips are getting millions of dollars for the re-election campaign of the President.  Fine.  However, the American Taxpayer should not pay for the political activities of the President.  How much does one round trip to California cost?  I understood that one round trip to California cost 56o thousand dollars.  Well, I do not the Prez. to go unprotected, but since these are fundamentally political campaign trips I think that the Congress should demand that the Democrat party pay the bill.  After all, it is Obama who is constantly criticizing the corporate executives for using company Jets for legitimate business purposes, saying that the CEO of Ford, and Kellogg, and Johnson and Johnson should fly first class or coach on public aircraft.  Okay!  What is good for one is good for the other.  The President should be severely limited in the use of Air Force One and required to prove that his use of the Jet is not for private or political gain but is used for the legally mandated affairs of State.  Otherwise, he can still use the Jet, its crew, the Secret Service, the Cook, the Maid, the Valet and all the rest, but the Democrat party must pay the bill, immediately before the trip and not after.  That is all we need, a late bill to the Democrat party, which, they will claim is Bush’s fault and therefore they are not responsible and cannot pay.  And one more thing, the President has given speeches for several weeks now that the Republicans must pass his jobs bill.  Well, if you note, today was the first day that the actual written bill was presented to the Congress.  How can the Congress even discuss a Bill they have not even seen.  The Obama White House needs to have a remedial lesson in how to get legislation passed.  It starts with writing the Bill. It continues with submitting the Bill.  Then the Administration is supposed to send its experts and analysts to Congress to explain the bill and then defend it.  Without all of this constitutionally mandated process, there is no bill and therefore the Congress is prevented by Obama and his administration from passing anything. Why?  BECAUSE WITHOUT A BILL THERE IS NOTHING TO PASS. It is all phony Obama.  Sad really!

Bill Clinton

http://www.newsmax.com/InsideCover/bill-clinton-gingrich-2012/2011/09/20/id/411722?s=al&promo_code=D175-1  This is a very interesting article because Bill Clinton is a thinker.  It also reveals the respect that President Clinton has for Speaker Gingrich.  I always pay attention to President Bill Clinton because he is a moderate Liberal with real life experience, was President for two terms, and was willing to actually compromise, and actually collaborate with the Republican party because unlike President Obama, Bill Clinton loves America, is not an idealog, and can see beyond his predilictions to the realities of the moment.