What Happened to Ross Perot?

There was a man named Ross Perot. Remember him? He was very much like Mr. Donald Trump.  He was a  business man. He was a billionaire. Both of them ran for President. What was Perot’s attractiveness? Perot gave expression to the fear and anxiety of the middle class of his time.
In his book titled, They Only Look Dead,  E.J. Dionne Jr. (1996) called those attracted to Ross Perot the “Anxious Middle”. In a very fine chapter about the Politics of the Anxious Middle,  Mr. Dionne wrote, (p.67)

The Anxious Middle set the terms for the 1992 and 1994 elections. It destroyed a Republican presidential coalition that seemed invulnerable only a few years earlier. It made Ross Perot possible, ended George (H.W) Bush’s political career, sent Bill Clinton to the White House – and rebuked Clinton and helped make Newt Gingrich one of the central figures of American politics. Perot spoke instinctively of the American Middle. Bush never understood it. Clinton saw it coming long before most politicians, shaped his campaign to respond to its concerns – and then confronted its ire after only two years in office. Gingrich sought his own radical language to speak to its anxieties

(p. 72) Almost as important as Clinton’s candidacy, of course, was Ross Perot’s, and his rise proved to be an essential component of Clinton’s victory.  In the spring of 1992, as discontent against Bush was growing, Perot’s sudden availability as a candidate shook loose millions of previously Republican voters.  Before he dropped out of the contest, Perot had risen to first in the polls and had driven Bush down to about a third of the potential vote.  In his withdrawal statement in July – in the midst of the Democratic National Convention – Perot gave Clinton a large boost when he explained that his candidacy might no longer be needed , “now that the Democratic Party has revitalized itself.”  Clinton soared in the polls.

Can we call the politics of Mr. Trump an appeal to the feelings of the Angry Middle?  His confrontational style, his harsh criticisms, his stand against media and news reporters, his comments to Megan Kelly at the debate, and his repeated statements of anger and frustration place him as their spokesperson.  Many of his supporters praise his fearless engagement with and rebuttal of the news reporters.  They like when he gives simple answers to, for instance, the immigration problem.  They admire that he is willing to say to anyone who disagrees with him, “you’re Fired.”

But as Mr. Dionne highlights, Ross Perot voluntarily left the race and abandoned his supporters.  He threw his support to Clinton.  He said that his candidacy was no longer needed now that the Democratic party was revived.  Was that it?  Did Perot play the American voters for fools?  Did he care about the voter’s or only about the revitalization of the Democrats?  Was he really just a rich old man who hated Bush and would do whatever he could to insure that Clinton won?  However you might feel about that analysis, the fact remains that Perot’s candidacy was phony and he never really cared about the “Anxious Middle.”  He cared about himself, the Clinton’s and the Democrat Party.

The parallels between Trump and Perot are startling.  Trump’s campaign is to feared because like Perot’s, Trump’s billionaire financing, his bitter anger at the press and media, and his threats of reprisal against those with whom he disagrees are enjoying the same kind of support that sent Perot to number one.  Plus, there is already talk among people that if Trump is not on the ballot, millions of voters will opt to stay home on Election Day.  Such an action of silent protest will throw the election to Mrs. Clinton and the voter’s will have been played twice the fool.

Hilary Clinton is an Old Woman

http://news.yahoo.com/ap-interview-clinton-raps-benghazi-critics-084552064–politics.html

It is time for those of us, and I too am 65, to give over and let the younger generation have a time at bat.  This is why I am appalled by those who want to run Hilary Clinton in 2016.  By then she will be 70 and frankly, although I too, do not think of myself as old, nonetheless, she and I are old, and it is time to give over the world to our children.

Regarding Benghazi, it seems to me that she should just move on and be a grandmother.  Her last grandstand is merely a revenge tactic against fellow citizens who do not agree with her view of what happened and what we can do about it.  She is merely trying to focus attention upon her critics and not upon the facts.  And this is doubly egregious since her whole speech is about the real world and the facts.  Yet, she is spinning about others and ignoring the false information from President Obama about the video, and the false talking points from some bogey man in the CIA, and the false statements on national television by the USA UN ambassador, and the weeks of administration insistence upon the video and the mob.

Mrs. Clinton lashes out at others as being not realistic, while she and the Obama administration attempted to blind fold the American public to the facts of Benghazi and her own and President Obama’s failure to treat the attack realistically.  She, and Obama, and the joint chiefs and the CIA and the FBI were all watching the events as they were happening.  It is the same as watching a person on a public street being attacked by a gang of four knife wielding crooks and doing nothing about it.  Because that is what she and President Obama did, they watched it happen, did nothing about it and went to bed as our citizens were tortured and brutally murdered at our embassy in Libya.

Mrs. Clinton should not be allowed to escape the verdict of the people that she and President Obama failed, and that they covered up by lying to the Press and the American people.  Both she and all involved should not be allowed to turn the tables on her accusers.  She and President Obama were in charge, our military was at the ready and it was Mrs. Clinton and President Obama who failed to grasp the gravity of the real life situation and instead waited for some kind of magical solution as they watched our citizens die in Benghazi.

This writer is not a Clinton hater and I know that many admire Mrs. Clinton for standing by her man during the Monica Lewinsky scandal.  Nonetheless, Benghazi is something that we cannot ignore in an attempt to “honor” a spurned wife.  Some would ask why I bring up the impeachment over the Lewinsky scandal.  Some would ask why I bring up Mrs. Clinton’s own evaluation and scathing criticism of Obama when she was running against him.  I do it because history is real and no amount of good intentions or fervor in favor of a particular person should blind us to the facts.  In fact, Mrs. Clinton’s parting speech says the same thing.  However, she wants to apply the rules to others but not to herself.  Well, friends, that is not real.

Hilary Clinton

http://www.newsmax.com/InsideCover/bill-clinton-hillary-ablest/2011/09/20/id/411721?s=al&promo_code=D175-1 Can Hilary still be the first female US President.  Indeed, she can.  Hilary is the recipient of adulation and anger.  Her stint as wife of President Bill Clinton, did not automatically make her qualified to be USA President.  However, her stint as Secretary of State in the dysfunctional Obama Administration, may make her very competitive as a candidate for President.  This writers opinion.  I am not automatically an adherent of Hilary Clinton.  However, the Secretary has proven mettle as Sec. of States, and like her husband she dearly loves America, which for this writer is a bottom line criteria for President, since, I wholeheartedly believe that President Obama just does not understand what love of Country is- since he is a Globalist Socialist.  However, Mrs. Clinton will need to trim her own Globalist and Interventionist tendency.  This writer, as noted in other posts, wholeheartedly believes that the USA should not intervene in the internal affairs of Sovereign States.

Hilary Cough?

It would have been better for Hilary to say what we all think, namely, that she was watching the invasion of a home and the killing of people LIVE…no sympathy for Osama but can we all at least be honest to say that watching the actual killing of another person is a stressful even a horrific event?