Tag: Obama

A Citizens Call to Action On Gun Control

https://www.usconcealedcarry.com/mindset/a-call-to-duty/?utm_source=SilverpopMailing&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=CCR%2012-21-2012%20Prospects%20(2)&utm_content=

 

A very thoughtful and passionate prposal for citizen action in light of school invasion and children’s murder.

White Americans Versus White Americans

0users disliked this commentFrederick • 1 day 7 hrs ago

“We are in the midst of historic cultural and demographic changes,” What does that mean?  And if it is true, how is President Obama the architect of cultural and demographic change?  Surely, he is not the father of all those demographic people and he is not the author of their culture.  Is this a reference to President Obama’s race?  Isn’t that racist?  Is it a reference to the Muslim influences on his life?  Isn’t that also stereotyping and could be considered prejudice?  Didn’t the father of modern racial attitudes say that we should judge a person by the content of their character and not the color of their skin?  I am wondering how many media people see President Obama as a black man?  Would MLK have preferred us to see Obama as a man who is is black?  What does Obama himself want?  Does he think of himself as a black man or a man who is black?  Can a white person think of themselves as a white person or a person who is white and what’s the difference?

3  View all 3 Replies

  • v1/comments/context/722c65d1-5ccf-33aa-8ee9-2f39cd35ce54/comment/1355943394839-0b995661-15b5-4c8c-a90f-793392323ace/reply/00004s000000000000000000000000-76b6c41e-e70d-4d64-86d7-732e8560ee90

    M
    0users liked this commentRate a Thumb UpRate a Thumb Down0users disliked this comment

    M • 1 day 6 hrs ago

    He is not their father but their representative. He is actually the architect because he is representing all of the different races and idealogies, instead of any other presidents who has only represented white christian bigots. And yes he is happened to be black.–Or is he?

  • Frederick
    0users liked this commentThumbs UpThumbs Down0users disliked this comment

    Frederick • a second agoRemove

    Sadly, you thing that White Christians are bigots.  But that is the problems.  White people are taught not to be proud that they are white and that they have a thousand plus years of illustrious history to include Christianity, Monasticism, the Universities, the hospitals, the Renaisance, the Enlightenment,Democracy,  Industrial revolution, computer revolution, digital revolution and that white europeans are in the front of the latest innovations in every measurable field of human endeavor.  But we are told to hand our heads down, and to stoop our shoulders and to recite the manta of Liberalism, namely, White and Christian is bad and black and Muslim is good.

Is Time right to call Obama the man of the Year?

“We are in the midst of historic cultural and demographic changes,”  What does that mean?  And if it is true, how is President Obama the architect of cultural and demographic change?  Surely, he is not the father of all those demographic people and he is not the author of their culture.  Is this a reference to President Obama’s race?  Isn’t that racist?  Is it a reference to the Muslim influences on his life?  Isn’t that also stereotyping and could be considered prejudice?  Didn’t the father of modern racial attitudes say that we should judge a person by the content of their character and not the color of their skin?  I am wondering how many media people see President Obama as a black man?  Would MLK have preferred us to see Obama as a man who is black?  What does Obama himself want?  Does he think of himself as a black man or a man who is black?  Can a white person think of themselves as a white person or a person who is white and what’s the difference?

It is the President and the Administration that is Stopping a Solution to the Fiscal Cliff

As reference see previous post concerning the Revenge Politics advocated by the Daily Beast.

“I can tell you the most recent promise the president has broken. He campaigned on a balanced approach to deficit reduction with more spending cuts than increased taxes. He even talked about it in the 2nd or 3rd debate. Instead he is proposing to raise taxes $1.6 trillion (the first year he has already outlined how it is to be spent on “stimulus” so no deficit reduction there at all). The spending cut is a POSSIBLE $400 billion over 10 years but nothing definite outlined.
For those of you who are math deficient, that is $4 in tax increases for every $1 of possible (but not likely) spending cuts. ”

It is very distressing to see the willingness of our people to accept the lie that the President only wants to tax the top two percent while everybody else gets a tax cut.  The facts of the President’s proposal are exactly opposite to what he tells the people.

Secondly, Pres. Obama wants the Congress to give away its right to review the debt ceiling and approve or deny raising it.  Why should they?  The Constitution gives the power of the purse to the Congress, specifically the House of Representatives.  When they are asked to give up this right, then we the people who voted for them are asked to give up this right.  We should not do it.

The Daily Beast newsletter may believe that it is right, just and proper for Obama to take revenge on the Republicans of the Congress for opposing him.  I do not agree.  The Congress is supposed to prevent tyranny by a systematic review of the Executive and the Judicial just as these branches of government are, in turn, to review the Congress.  This is not a system of revenge politics as proposed by Pelosi and Reid.  It is the Constitution.

Lastly, I believe that the rules of our social contract intend that the President is the President of the whole nation and not only of those who voted for him.  He is not supposed to be the President of the Democrats and the enemy of the Republicans.  If the Daily Beast believes such foolishness, then Obama is supposed to be the enemy of 48 percent of the citizens and the friend of the remainder.  If that is the case, can anyone blame the 48 % of the citizens to do all in their power during the next four years to opposed Obama who, in this case, is said to be their enemy?

Yes, the Democrat party won the Presidency but that is no excuse for attempts to destroy the Republican party.  Likewise, the Republicans won the majority in the House of Representatives and that is no excuse for always opposing the Democrat President.  The same applies to the Senate.

This writer is distressed by all of what Secretary Geithner calls “political theater.”  I agree that it is a necessary part of the political process, however, he then turns around and says that the House of Representatives, symbolized by the Speaker, is required to prove to the Executive how much they are willing to raise taxes.  That is absurd.  The Constitution gives the power of taxation to the Congress and not the President. Secondly, the House need prove nothing to the President.  He is required to submit his proposals to the House and they are required to debate, argue and either accept, reject or modify them.  What Geithner here proposes is to accomplish the legislation in a conference with the White House before it is even submitted to the Congress.  I disagree.

Let the President put his proposal to the House.  Let the administration, by using their Congressional Democrat proxies, argue their case before the full 495 Representatives.  And let the House vote and send it onto the Senate.  Only in this way will progress be made.

And Senator Harry Reid should stop bragging that any House of Representatives budget proposal that is not pre approved by Obama is Dead On Arrival in the Senate.  Who is the obstructionist in this process? There are many and they are:  The President, Nancy Pelosi, Reid, Geithner.  What the Republicans are trying very hard to do is to play according to the rule book which is called the Constitution.  There may be some who adhere to the Revenge politics advocated by the Daily Beast.  I do not.

Daily Beast Newsletter to Destroy Democracy

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/12/01/michael-tomasky-on-obama-s-republican-revenge-over-the-debt-limit.html?utm_medium=email&utm_source=newsletter&utm_campaign=cheatsheet_morning&cid=newsletter%3Bemail%3Bcheatsheet_morning&utm_term=Cheat%20Sheet

 

Read it for yourself and decide.  This is revenge politics and the USA be damned.  This is an indication of total disregard for the seperation of powers and the nation be damned.  This is an article that promotes Obama over everything much like the Nazi’s chanted Germany over everything.  The sadness here is that the daily beast editors have nothing in their newletter about what is really good for America.  Oh, Yes, I forgot, whatever the daily beast feels will make the democrat party stronger and what the daily beast editors feel will elevate Obama to the status of Ruler.

Will Obama Offer Romney a Cabinet Position?

There is a rumor that he will.  But you know about rumors!!
I think that offering Mitt Romney a cabinet position would be awesome.  Would he accept?  Let’s be honest and human, after all Mitt is a human so we all realize what a crushing emotional burden his loss is to him.  I am only his supporter and I feel really sad. Yet, would I be big enough to accept such an offer.  Truth…I don’t know.  I hope that I would and I probably would but I don’t want to be joe the righteous here.  Nonetheless, an offer of the President to Governor Romney would indeed be most gracious.  Hilary took the offer but it can be argued whether she did a good job.  Mitt would definitely do a good job but philosophical reasons may hinder him.  Yet, is it better be inside the halls of power influencing decisions, or outside shouting at the walls?  We’ll see.  This is all probably the citizen’s wishful thinking.  But if it were to happen it would be revolutionary.

Dis illusioned Citizen

There is not much to say since my candidate lost and Barrack Hussein Obama won.  However,  just a few observations:

The Republican party is merely a foil to the dominant Democrat party.  The Republicans do not make any difference at the national level, rather, in a weird twist, they are merely a legitimation of the Democrat dominance which unwittedly gives the illusion that there really is political choice in America when there is not.

The right pundits like Hannity, Rush, Levin, Riley and the like were failures because they are conservative purists who have a elite viewpoint of “true conservative.”  This arrogant viewpoint was exclusionary and allowed them to withhold full support of Romney and  Ryan until R/R met their elitist demands.

American Unions are merely the willing tools of the left and the Democrat party.  The sadness here is that many Americans are forced to allow their weekly dues to be used to support a political party with which they disagree.

The Media of the USA are the willing accomplices of the Democrat party and especially of Barrack Hussein Obama and they are very willing to deliver the nation to him because they believe, as did many of the press in nazi Germany, that Barrack is the “Leader” who will lead us into a nirvana.

The Federal bureaucracy is a willing tool of the Democrat party and constantly seeks to increase it power over the sovereign States because this will ensure them life long jobs.

Our Academic community is a product of a liberal anti Christian and anti Conservative process that indoctrinated them and in turn is indoctrinating our children into the belief that the government is the source of all things instead of God, a deification the State over the individual person.

The solution:  Give up!  Yes, give up and give over.  If the nation wants one party and only one party;  If the nation wants a welfare state;  If the nation is indicating by Barrack Hussein Obama’s election that he is the “Leader” we all should follow.  Then so be it.

After all this is still America and at least for now, our federal election system is honest.  However, the best bet for Republicans and for Independents is to abandon the system and take care of yourself first, always and only.

Sound cynical?  It is.  Sound angry? It is,  Sound like a sore loser?  No, just the voice of an older person, who has believed in America but is seeing that his America is no more.  It is just the voice of a parent who wants the children to move out on their own and pay their own bills and set up their own institutions and do their own thing without any reference at all, to my house, my possession, my accomplishments, my institutions, my money and without any reliance on getting my inheritance because you know what (?) I am gonna spend it on myself and real fast because I fear that the youth who voted for Obama will want it and I ain’t gonna give it to them,